LeGrand v. DeMert Brands, LLC
| Condalisa LeGrand |
| DeMert Brands, LLC |
| 0:2022cv62306 |
| December 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Raag Singhal |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 Plaintiff's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Condalisa LeGrand (Ostrow, Jeffrey) |
Filing 19
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #18 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney Paul K. Joseph. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 1/13/2023. (eca)
|
| Filing 18 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Paul K. Joseph. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-16239730 by Condalisa LeGrand. Responses due by 1/27/2023 (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Ostrow, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jeffrey Miles Ostrow on behalf of Condalisa LeGrand. Attorney Jeffrey Miles Ostrow added to party Condalisa LeGrand(pty:pla). (Ostrow, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 16 Unopposed MOTION to Consolidate Cases Related by DeMert Brands, LLC. Attorney Thomas Meeks added to party DeMert Brands, LLC(pty:dft). Responses due by 12/28/2022 (Meeks, Thomas) |
|
Filing 15
PAPERLESS ORDER TO FILE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONSWithin SEVEN (7) DAYS of entry of an appearance, each party, including governmental parties, must file certificates of interested parties and corporate disclosure statements that contain a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party. The parties shall not include Judge Singhal or the paired magistrate judges as interested parties unless they have an interest in the litigation. Throughout the pendency of the action, the parties are under a continuing obligation to amend, correct, and update the certificates. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 12/12/2022. (eca)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions.Parties are encouraged to seek extensions of time in a timely fashion. "A motion for extension of time is not self-executing; no motion is, unless expressly provided for by the applicable rule. Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle pending the Court's disposition of the motion, parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this." Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) (internal citations omitted).Exhibits to pleadings and motions shall be docketed in accordance with the Courts CM/ECF procedures, Rule 3L.(2): (2) Describing an Attachment to a Docket EntryA party filing an attachment to a document shall select one of the prescribed attachment categories from the drop-down menu (e.g., affidavit, transcript), provide an alphabetical or numerical designation (e.g., Exhibit A, Exhibit 1), and descriptively name each attachment (e.g., Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Boo Radley) in a manner that enables the Court to easily locate and distinguish attachments. (Emphasis added.) Local Rule 16.4, Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, requires that a Notice of Settlement "shall be filed and served jointly by counsel for all parties to the settlement." A unilateral notice of settlement will not stay pre-trial deadlines or hearings.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 12/12/2022. (eca) |
| Filing 13 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney Paul K. Joseph, Caroline Emhardt, Jack Fitzgerald, Melanie Rae Persinger, Trevor Matthew Flynn, Steven Weisburd, mailing date December 9, 2022, (pt) |
| Filing 12 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jua) |
| Filing 11 Case transferred in from California Northern; Case Number 3:22-cv-07374. Electronic file including transfer order and docket sheet received. .(jua). |
|
Filing 10
Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #9 Stipulation to Transfer Venue to Southern District of Florida. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2022)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Condalisa LeGrand. (Joseph, Paul) (Filed on 12/6/2022) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by DeMert Brands, LLC.. (Weisburd, Steven) (Filed on 12/6/2022) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Condalisa LeGrand.. (Joseph, Paul) (Filed on 12/6/2022) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Condalisa LeGrand. DeMert Brands, LLC served on 11/29/2022, answer due 12/20/2022. (Flynn, Trevor) (Filed on 12/5/2022) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/16/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/23/2023 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2022) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to DeMert Brands, LLC. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2022) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/6/2022. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2022) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Joseph, Paul) (Filed on 11/22/2022) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DeMert Brands, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-17749947.). Filed byCondalisa LeGrand. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Affidavit of Venue Pursuant to California Consumers Legal Remedies Act)(Joseph, Paul) (Filed on 11/22/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
