Oppedisano v. Olive
Vincenzo Oppedisano |
BENJAMIN E. OLIVE |
0:2022mc61884 |
October 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Panayotta D Augustin-Birch |
William P Dimitrouleas |
P.I.: Other |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER DENYING #1 PETITIONER'S MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Panayotta D Augustin-Birch on 11/18/2022. See attached document for full details. (sk01) |
Filing 6 REPLY to #5 Response/Reply (Other), #1 Petition/Motion (Complaint) RE: Subpoena from Another District, by Vincenzo Oppedisano. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 -- Service E-mail, #2 Exhibit 2 -- Olive Judd Website)(Todd, Ryan) |
Filing 5 RESPONSE to #1 Petition/Motion (Complaint) RE: Subpoena from Another District, 4 Order to Show Cause,, by Benjamin E. Olive. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - check)(DeSouza, Daniel) |
Filing 4 PAPERLESS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Respondent's Response to Petitioner's Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena #1 was due on October 21, 2022. Respondent has not filed a Response to date. By no later than October 28, 2022, Respondent shall show cause in writing why he has failed to timely respond and why the Motion should not be granted. Respondent's failure to comply with this Order to Show Cause by October 28 may result in the Motion being granted by default without further notice. Petitioner shall file any Reply in support of the Motion within seven days of the filing of a Response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Panayotta Augustin-Birch on 10/25/2022. (sk01) |
PAPERLESS ORDER setting briefing schedule. Respondent shall file a Response to Petitioner's Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena filed at docket entry #1 by October 21, 2022. Petitioner shall file any Reply by October 28, 2022. (sk01) |
Filing 3 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Panayotta Augustin-Birch for a ruling on all non-dispositive matters and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matter. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 10/11/2022. See attached document for full details. (jas) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas. (rbe) |
Filing 1 Petition/Motion (Complaint) RE: Subpoena to Enforce from Another District . Filing fee $49.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16008286, filed by Vincenzo Oppedisano. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1- Declaration, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Todd, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Oppedisano v. Olive | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Vincenzo Oppedisano | |
Represented By: | Ryan Kenneth Todd |
Represented By: | Kempshall McAndrew |
Represented By: | Michael V. Caruso |
Represented By: | Jonathan Etra |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: BENJAMIN E. OLIVE | |
Represented By: | Daniel DeSouza |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.