Dasher v. Broward County et al
| James Octavis Dasher |
| Broward County, Broward County Main Jail and Broward County Sheriff's Office |
| 0:2023cv60094 |
| January 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Beth Bloom |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER CLOSING CASE. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 3/1/2023. See attached document for full details. (jas)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER Dismissing Complaint (Without Prejudice) . Denying without prejudice #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, denying without prejudice #4 MOTION for Referral to Volunteer Attorney Program. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 1/25/2023. See attached document for full details. (Attachments: #1 Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights) (jas)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Referral to Volunteer Attorney Program by James Octavis Dasher. (daa) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James Octavis Dasher. (daa) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom. (daa) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Broward County, Broward County Main Jail, Broward County Sheriff's Office. Filing fee $ 402.00. IFP Filed, filed by James Octavis Dasher.(daa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
