Williams v. Florida Department of Corrections
Plaintiff: Oliver D. Williams
Defendant: Florida Department of Corrections
Case Number: 0:2023cv60226
Filed: February 6, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Beth Bloom
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 PAPERLESS ORDER denying as moot #8 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom (BB)
February 22, 2023 Filing 10 NOTICE of Compliance re 9 Order on Motion to Reopen Case. Docket sheet mailed to Petitioner. (scn)
February 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 PAPERLESS ORDER denying as moot #8 Motion to Reopen Case. The Clerk received Petitioner's filing fee on February 15, 2023. ECF No. #4 . The Court reopened Petitioner's case on February 16, 2023. ECF No. #6 . Given that Petitioner's case has already been reopened, Petitioner's Motion is moot. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this docket sheet to Petitioner. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom (aun)
February 22, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION to Reinstate Case/MOTION for Extension of Time to Pay Filing Fee by Oliver D. Williams. Responses due by 3/8/2023. (scn)
February 22, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Richard Chambers Valuntas on behalf of Florida Department of Corrections. Attorney Richard Chambers Valuntas added to party Florida Department of Corrections(pty:dft). (Valuntas, Richard)
February 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, ( Responses due by 4/18/2023) Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 2/16/2023. See attached document for full details. (cqs)
February 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 2/16/2023. See attached document for full details. (cqs)
February 15, 2023 Filing 4 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 2/15/2023 in the amount of $ 5.00, receipt number 16581. (drz)
February 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the case, and all pending motions are DENIED as moot. Closing Case. (Without Prejudice) Signed by Judge Beth Bloom on 2/8/2023. See attached document for full details. (scn)
February 6, 2023 Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Beth Bloom. (daa)
February 6, 2023 Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Filing fee $ 5.00 (Filing fee not paid/IFP Motion not filed), filed by Oliver D. Williams.(daa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Florida Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Oliver D. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Florida Department of Corrections
Represented By: Noticing 2254 SAG Broward and North
Represented By: Richard Chambers Valuntas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?