Hava v. City of Hollywood et al
Zipora Hava |
City of Hollywood, Kyle Otwell and Officer #1 Unknown |
0:2023cv60537 |
March 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Raag Singhal |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Zipora Hava (Taylor, Rashad) |
![]() |
Filing 10 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal by City of Hollywood. (Breeden, Kendra) |
Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and incorporated motion to strike plaintiff's claim for attorney's fees by Kyle Otwell. Responses due by 4/17/2023 (Alvarez, Tamatha) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kendra Shauntia Breeden on behalf of City of Hollywood. Attorney Kendra Shauntia Breeden added to party City of Hollywood(pty:dft). (Breeden, Kendra) |
Filing 7 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Kyle Otwell (Alvarez, Tamatha) |
![]() |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions (and responses to motions) with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions (and responses).Parties are encouraged to seek extensions of time in a timely fashion. "A motion for extension of time is not self-executing; no motion is, unless expressly provided for by the applicable rule. Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle pending the Court's disposition of the motion, parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this." Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) (internal citations omitted).Exhibits to pleadings and motions shall be docketed in accordance with the Courts CM/ECF procedures, Rule 3L.(2): (2) Describing an Attachment to a Docket EntryA party filing an attachment to a document shall select one of the prescribed attachment categories from the drop-down menu (e.g., affidavit, transcript), provide an alphabetical or numerical designation (e.g., Exhibit A, Exhibit 1), and descriptively name each attachment (e.g., Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Boo Radley) in a manner that enables the Court to easily locate and distinguish attachments. (Emphasis added.) Local Rule 16.4, Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, requires that a Notice of Settlement "shall be filed and served jointly by counsel for all parties to the settlement." A unilateral notice of settlement will not stay pre-trial deadlines or hearings.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 3/23/2023. (am00) |
Filing 4 Notice of Entry of Parties Listed on 3 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case, into CM/ECF. NOTE: New Filer(s) will appear twice, since they are also a new party in the case. New Filer(s)/Party(s): Officer #1 Unknown. (Alvarez, Tamatha) |
Filing 3 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Parties Not Added. The Filer failed to add all parties associated with the case. Filer is instructed to add the additional parties by filing a Notice of Entry of Parties. It is not necessary to re-file this document. (aao) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (aao) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Hava v. City of Hollywood, et al.) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16451071, filed by Kyle Otwell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Summons and Complaint, #3 Exhibit State Court Docket)No Answer/Motion to Dismiss.(Alvarez, Tamatha) Modified on 3/22/2023 (aao). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.