Saccone v. Carstrada, Inc. et al
| Morgan M Saccone |
| Carstrada, Inc., Westlake Services, LLC, d/b/a Westlake Financial Services and Westlake Services, LLC A Foreign corporation doing business as Westlake Financial Services |
| 0:2023cv60782 |
| April 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Raag Singhal |
| Commerce ICC Rates, Etc. |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Fraud-Motor Vehicle (Odometer) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report Joint Scheduling Report due by 7/7/2023 Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 6/12/2023. See attached document for full details. (pc)
|
| Filing 12 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by Westlake Services, LLC. (Liebler, James) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ira Scott Silverstein on behalf of Westlake Services, LLC. Attorney Ira Scott Silverstein added to party Westlake Services, LLC(pty:dft). (Silverstein, Ira) |
|
Filing 10
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Answer to a Complaint or Other Case Initiating Document by Westlake Services, LLC. Response/Answer due 6/7/2023. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 5/24/2023. (pb00)
|
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint, by Westlake Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order proposed Order)(Liebler, James) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by James Randolph Liebler, II on behalf of Westlake Services, LLC. Attorney James Randolph Liebler, II added to party Westlake Services, LLC(pty:dft). (Liebler, James) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Morgan M Saccone. Westlake Services, LLC served on 5/4/2023, response/answer due 5/25/2023. (Feygin, Joshua) |
|
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER TO FILE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONSWithin SEVEN (7) DAYS of entry of an appearance, each party, including governmental parties, must file certificates of interested parties and corporate disclosure statements that contain a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party. The parties shall not include Judge Singhal or the paired magistrate judges as interested parties unless they have an interest in the litigation. Throughout the pendency of the action, the parties are under a continuing obligation to amend, correct, and update the certificates. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 4/28/2023. (pb00)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions (and responses to motions) with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions (and responses).Parties are encouraged to seek extensions of time in a timely fashion. "A motion for extension of time is not self-executing; no motion is, unless expressly provided for by the applicable rule. Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle pending the Court's disposition of the motion, parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this." Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) (internal citations omitted).Exhibits to pleadings and motions shall be docketed in accordance with the Courts CM/ECF procedures, Rule 3L.(2): (2) Describing an Attachment to a Docket EntryA party filing an attachment to a document shall select one of the prescribed attachment categories from the drop-down menu (e.g., affidavit, transcript), provide an alphabetical or numerical designation (e.g., Exhibit A, Exhibit 1), and descriptively name each attachment (e.g., Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Boo Radley) in a manner that enables the Court to easily locate and distinguish attachments. (Emphasis added.) Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 4/28/2023. (pb00) |
| Filing 4 First Corporate Disclosure Statement by Morgan M Saccone (Feygin, Joshua) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Carstrada, Inc., Westlake Services, LLC. (rbe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (rbe) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Carstrada, Inc., Westlake Services, LLC, d/b/a Westlake Financial Services. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16575655, filed by Morgan M Saccone. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Summons, #3 Summon(s) Summons, #4 Exhibit Exhibit A, #5 Exhibit Exhibit B, #6 Exhibit Exhibit C, #7 Exhibit Exhibit D)(Feygin, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
