Jennings v. Pollock et al
| David Jennings |
| Andrew Pollock, Jayson Moreno, Raymond Maycock, Justin Lugo, Jean-Baptiste, Javon Norman Fox, Justin Victor Lugo and Lieutenant Jean-Baptiste |
| 0:2023cv61016 |
| May 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Raag Singhal |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Javon Norman Fox, Jean-Baptiste, Justin Victor Lugo, Raymond Maycock, Jayson Moreno, Andrew Pollock. (nwn) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nwn) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against All Plaintiffs. Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16655124, filed by David Jennings. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Pollock Summons, #3 Summon(s) Jean-Baptiste Summons, #4 Summon(s) Fox Summons, #5 Summon(s) Lugo Summons, #6 Summon(s) Maycock Summons, #7 Summon(s) Moreno)(Lett, Ariel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
