Emrit v. Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) et al
| Ronald Satish Emrit |
| Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE), Broward County State Attorney's Office (SAO), Broward County Attorney, City of Fort Lauderdale Attorney and Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody |
| 0:2023cv61208 |
| June 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Ft Lauderdale Office |
| Raag Singhal |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jua) |
| Filing 11 Case transferred in from South Carolina; Case Number 3:23-cv-01629. Electronic file including transfer order and docket sheet received. .(jua). |
| Filing 10 JUDGMENT: It is ordered that venue is improper in this District and transfers this case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. (alew) |
Filing 9
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting #6 Report and Recommendation as set out. Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 6/26/23. (alew)
|
| Filing 8 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED 5 Text Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and 7 Transfer of Case Management, placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Ronald Satish Emrit, 6655 38th Lane East, Sarasota, Fl 34243. (lbak) |
| Filing 7 ***CASE MANAGEMENT TRANSFERRED to civil case manager for Judge Donald C. Coggins, Jr.. Any future filings must be sent to the Clerk's Office at the following address: Donald S. Russell Fed. Bldg., 201 Magnolia Street, Spartanburg, SC 29306. (lbak) |
| Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending the district court transfer this matter to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida for disposition. Objections to R&R due by 5/11/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 4/26/2023. (lbak) |
|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 4/26/2023. (lbak)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Ronald Satish Emrit. Response to Motion due by 5/4/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (lbak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Broward County Attorney, Broward County State Attorney's Office (SAO), City of Fort Lauderdale Attorney, Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE), Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody, filed by Ronald Satish Emrit. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope) (lbak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
