Emrit v. Jules
Ronald Satish Emrit |
Sabine Aisha Jules |
0:2023cv61210 |
June 26, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Ft Lauderdale Office |
Rodney Smith |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER Dismissing Case / Closing Case. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 6/29/2023. See attached document for full details. (drz) |
Filing 17 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jua) |
Filing 16 Case transferred in from South Carolina; Case Number 3:23-cv-01573. Electronic file including transfer order and docket sheet received. .(jua). |
Filing 15 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #13 Order Ruling on Report and Recommendation, #14 Judgment, placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Ronald Satish Emrit 6655 38th Lane East Sarasota, FL 34243 (alew) |
Filing 14 JUDGMENT: It is ordered that venue is improper in this District and transfers this case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Plaintiff's Motion for Joinder of an Indispensable Party is denied as moot. (alew) |
Filing 13 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting #6 Report and Recommendation, finding as moot #11 Motion for Joinder, filed by Ronald Satish Emrit. Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 6/26/23. (alew) |
SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 12 [utility] restricted/sealed until further notice. (jua) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Joinder of United States Attorney's Office in Massachusetts as a Necessary and Indispensable Party Pursuant to Rule 19 of Federal Rles of Civil Procedure (FRCP) by Ronald Satish Emrit. Response to Motion due by 5/31/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.(alew, ) |
SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 10 [utility] restricted/sealed until further notice. (jua) |
Filing 9 OBJECTION (titled as Notice of Appeal) to #6 Report and Recommendation by Ronald Satish Emrit. Reply to Objections due by 5/26/2023 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (alew, ) |
Filing 8 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED 5 Text Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and 7 Transfer of Case Management placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Ronald Satish Emrit, 6655 38th Lane East, Sarasota, Fl 34243. (lbak) |
Filing 7 ***CASE MANAGEMENT TRANSFERRED to civil case manager for Judge Donald C. Coggins, Jr.. Any future filings must be sent to the Clerk's Office at the following address: Donald S. Russell Fed Bldg, 201 Magnolia Street, Spartanburg, SC 29306. (lbak) |
Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending Plaintiff's action be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. In the alternative, the undersigned recommends this matter be transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida for further disposition. Objections to R&R due by 5/11/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 4/27/2023. (lbak) |
Filing 5 TEXT ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 4/27/2023. (lbak) |
SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 4 [utility] restricted/sealed until further notice. (jua) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Ronald Satish Emrit. Response to Motion due by 5/1/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (lbak) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET - Private Entry. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (lbak) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sabine Aisha Jules, filed by Ronald Satish Emrit. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope) (lbak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Emrit v. Jules | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ronald Satish Emrit | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Sabine Aisha Jules | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.