Payne v. YAM MARGATE, LLC et al
| Denise Payne |
| YAM MARGATE, LLC and SR MARGATE INC. |
| 0:2023cv61322 |
| July 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodney Smith |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Settlement as to Defendant SR MARGATE INC. by Denise Payne (Perez, Anthony) |
Filing 14
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #13 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Comply with the Court's Order. The parties shall file their Joint Scheduling Report by September 18, 2023. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 8/18/2023. (cbn)
|
| Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time COMPLY WITH THE COURTS ORDER re #8 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report, by Denise Payne. Responses due by 8/31/2023 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Perez, Anthony) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by SR MARGATE INC.. (Entin, Joshua) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Change of Address, Email or Law Firm Name by Joshua Michael Entin (Entin, Joshua) |
| Filing 10 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by SR MARGATE INC. (Entin, Joshua) |
| Filing 9 Certificate of Other Affiliates by Denise Payne identifying Other Affiliate Pablo Baez, AccessAble, Other Affiliate Michael Sasoni Jr., Other Affiliate Ilan Asiiag, Other Affiliate Alizza Asiiag, Other Affiliate Michael J. Sasoni, Other Affiliate Fatema A Chowdhury, Other Affiliate Mohammad S Reza for Denise Payne (Perez, Anthony) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT, CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS. (Joint Scheduling Report due by 8/18/2023). Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 7/24/2023. See attached document for full details. (nan)
|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Denise Payne. SR MARGATE INC. served on 7/13/2023, response/answer due 8/17/2023. (Perez, Anthony) |
|
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #5 Defendant SR Margate, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Serve a Response to the Complaint. SR Margate, Inc. shall file its response by August 17, 2023. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 7/20/2023. (cbn)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer as to #1 Complaint by SR MARGATE INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Proposed Order)(Entin, Joshua) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Joshua Michael Entin on behalf of SR MARGATE INC.. Attorney Joshua Michael Entin added to party SR MARGATE INC.(pty:dft). (Entin, Joshua) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to SR MARGATE INC. and YAM MARGATE, LLC. (scn) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (scn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SR MARGATE INC., YAM MARGATE, LLC. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16758013, filed by Denise Payne. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s))(Perez, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
