Exist Inc. v. Starr Indemnity & Liability Company
| Exist Inc. |
| Starr Indemnity & Liability Company |
| 0:2023cv61512 |
| August 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| William P Dimitrouleas |
| Raag Singhal |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES. ORDER granting #10 Motion to Consolidate Cases. Case No. 23-cv-61511-WPD and Case No. 23-cv-61512-WPD are hereby CONSOLIDATED for all purposes, including trial. All pleadings and papers shall be filed in the lower numbered case, Case No. 23-cv-61511-WPD and shall henceforth bear the caption set forth by the Court on page 1 of this Order. Case No. 23-cv-61512-WPD is hereby ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. Any documents filed in Case No. 23-cv-61512-WPD in the future shall be automatically stricken. Any future references in this consolidation action to documents already filed in Case No. 23-cv-61512 shall refer to that case number and docket entry number. The Clerk is DIRECTED to place a copy of this Order in Case No. 23-cv-61511- WPD and Case No. 23-cv-61512-WPD, thereby indicating that the cases have been consolidated. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 8/16/2023. See attached document for full details. (nan)
|
| Cases associated. (nan) |
| Civil Case Terminated. Closing Case. Per Order, DE#19 .(nan) |
| Filing 18 Defendant's REPLY to #10 MOTION to Consolidate Cases IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE RELATED MATTERS by Starr Indemnity & Liability Company. (Acuna, Krista) |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Exist Inc.. Replies due by 8/21/2023. (Applebaum, Craig) |
| Filing 16 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Exist Inc. (Garcia, Alejandro) |
| Set/Reset Response/Answer Due Deadline: Starr Indemnity & Liability Company response/answer due 8/21/2023. Per Order, DE#15 . (nan) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant shall have until August 21, 2023 to respond to the Complaint. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 8/11/2023. See attached document for full details. (nan)
|
| Filing 14 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINTS by Starr Indemnity & Liability Company. Responses due by 8/25/2023 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Acuna, Krista) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER REQUIRING EXPEDITED RESPONSE re #10 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Starr Indemnity & Liability Company, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings as to #10 MOTION to Consolidate Cases .(Responses due by 8/14/2023, Replies due by 8/16/2023.) Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 8/9/2023. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO MEET, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT; VACATING ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT DE #7 . Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 8/9/2023. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER OF TRANSFER to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas for all further proceedings, accepted and signed on 8/9/2023. Judge Raag Singhal no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 8/9/2023. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Starr Indemnity & Liability Company. Responses due by 8/23/2023 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Exhibit Starr's Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit Notice of Appeal, #4 Exhibit Notice of Removal)(Acuna, Krista) |
| Filing 9 Notice of Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Starr Indemnity & Liability Company (Acuna, Krista) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Starr Indemnity & Liability Company of Filing State Court Documents (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit State Court Summons, #3 Exhibit State Court Complaint) (Acuna, Krista) |
|
Filing 7
VACATED. Order Requiring Scheduling Report. Joint Scheduling Report due by 9/1/2023 Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 8/8/2023. See attached document for full details. (drz) Modified per DE #12 Order on 8/10/2023 (ebz).
|
|
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER TO FILE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONSWithin SEVEN (7) DAYS of entry of an appearance, each party, including governmental parties, must file certificates of interested parties and corporate disclosure statements that contain a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party. The parties shall not include Judge Singhal or the paired magistrate judges unless they have an interest in the litigation. Throughout the pendency of the action, the parties are under a continuing obligation to amend, correct, and update the certificates. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 8/8/2023. (pb00)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions (and responses to motions) with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions (and responses).Parties are encouraged to seek extensions of time in a timely fashion. "A motion for extension of time is not self-executing; no motion is, unless expressly provided for by the applicable rule. Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle pending the Court's disposition of the motion, parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this." Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) (internal citations omitted).Exhibits to pleadings and motions shall be docketed in accordance with the Courts CM/ECF procedures, Rule 3L.(2): (2) Describing an Attachment to a Docket EntryA party filing an attachment to a document shall select one of the prescribed attachment categories from the drop-down menu (e.g., affidavit, transcript), provide an alphabetical or numerical designation (e.g., Exhibit A, Exhibit 1), and descriptively name each attachment (e.g., Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Boo Radley) in a manner that enables the Court to easily locate and distinguish attachments. (Emphasis added.) Local Rule 16.4, Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, requires that a Notice of Settlement "shall be filed and served jointly by counsel for all parties to the settlement." A unilateral notice of settlement will not stay pre-trial deadlines or hearings.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 8/8/2023. (pb00) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Starr Indemnity & Liability Company re 3 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (Acuna, Krista) |
| Filing 3 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. No Civil Cover Sheet. Filer is instructed to file a Notice (Other) with the Civil Cover Sheet attached within 24 hours of the notice. (rbe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia O. Valle is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (rbe) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16822185, filed by Starr Indemnity & Liability Co. No Answer/ Motion to Dismiss Filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit Affidavit of Service, #3 Exhibit Declaration of Robert Fox, #4 Exhibit Declaration of Sabrina Blackmon, #5 Exhibit Report of Transit Risk Management)(Acuna, Krista) Modified text & attachment description on 8/7/2023 (rbe). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Exist Inc. v. Starr Indemnity & Liability Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Exist Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Alejandro Franklin Garcia |
| Represented By: | Craig Applebaum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Starr Indemnity & Liability Company | |
| Represented By: | Krista Fowler Acuna |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
