wright v. United States Postal Service
| brian wright |
| United States Postal Service |
| 0:2023cv61530 |
| August 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodney Smith |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by United States Postal Service (Plechac-Diaz, Felipe) |
| Filing 7 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by brian wright (Attachments: #1 Appendix A: Proposed Order)(Lett, Ariel) |
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #5 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint. Defendant shall file its response by October 16, 2023. No further extensions will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 8/16/2023. (cbn)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer by United States Postal Service. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Plechac-Diaz, Felipe) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT, CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS. Joint Scheduling Report due by 9/6/2023 Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 8/9/2023. See attached document for full details. (drz)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Compliance with 28 USC 1446(d) by United States Postal Service (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Notice of Removal) (Plechac-Diaz, Felipe) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (pc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $402.00. USA Filer - No Filing Fee Required, filed by United States Postal Service. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - State Court Summons, #4 Exhibit C - State Court Docket Sheet, #5 Exhibit D - State Court Filings)(Plechac-Diaz, Felipe) (Complaint see Exh.A, Amended Complaint see pg.15 of Exh.D, no Answer/Motion to Dismiss filed) Modified text on 8/9/2023 (pc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: wright v. United States Postal Service | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: brian wright | |
| Represented By: | Ariel Tai Ryan Nichol Lett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States Postal Service | |
| Represented By: | Felipe Plechac-Diaz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
