SNOGO, LLC v. EZ GO, LLC
| SNOGO, LLC |
| EZ GO, LLC |
| 0:2023cv61743 |
| September 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodney Smith |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 0271 Patent Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney Stewart D. Cables. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 10/31/2023. (cbn)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Stewart D. Cables. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-17036418 by SNOGO, LLC. Responses due by 11/14/2023 (Attachments: #1 Certification in Good Standing, #2 Certification of Stewart D. Cables, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Wolfe, Richard) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE OF PROCESS. ORDER denying #7 Motion. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 10/5/2023. See attached document for full details. (nan)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Alternative Service of Process re #1 Complaint, by SNOGO, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Wolfe, Richard) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to EZ GO, LLC. (ls) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by SNOGO, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Wolfe, Richard) |
| Filing 4 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney Stewart D. Cables, mailing date September 12, 2023, (pt) |
| Filing 3 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (jc) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against EZ GO, LLC. Filing fees $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16906501, filed by SNOGO, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit B1, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit C1, #7 Exhibit D, #8 Exhibit E)(Wolfe, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SNOGO, LLC v. EZ GO, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: SNOGO, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Richard Charles Wolfe |
| Represented By: | Stewart D. Cables |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: EZ GO, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
