Sully et al v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
| Daniel Sully and Cynthia Dauphin |
| Scottsdale Insurance Company |
| 0:2023cv61967 |
| October 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Roy K Altman |
| James I Cohn |
| Patrick M Hunt |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Senior Judge James I. Cohn. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (rbe) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - COMPLAINT FOR STATUTORY BAD FAITH DUE TO BREACH OF SECTIONS 624.155 & 626.9541) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-16995627, filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. No Answer/ Motion To Dismiss Filed. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A- State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit Exhibit E)(Barzyk, Michael) Modified text & attachment description on 10/16/2023 (rbe). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
