Harrell v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.
Christina Harrell |
Publix Super Markets, Inc. |
0:2023cv62255 |
November 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Rodney Smith |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by Christina Harrell (Hunt, Daniel) |
Filing 7 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Christina Harrell (Hunt, Daniel) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Daniel H. Hunt on behalf of Christina Harrell (Hunt, Daniel) |
Filing 5 ORDER Requiring Joint Scheduling Report (JSR), Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements. The parties to file their JSR on or before December 29, 2023. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 12/7/2023. See attached document for full details. (agy) |
Set Deadline per DE#5: Joint Scheduling Report due by 12/29/2023. (scn) |
Filing 4 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Publix Super Markets, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate Lone Palm Golf Club, LLC, Other Affiliate Morning Song, LLC, Other Affiliate PTO, LLC, Other Affiliate Publix Alabama, LLC, Other Affiliate Publix Aprons Event Planning and Catering, LLC, Other Affiliate Publix Asset Management Company, Other Affiliate Publix North Carolina Employee Services, LLC, Other Affiliate Publix North Carolina, LP, Other Affiliate Publix Tennessee, LLC, Other Affiliate Real Sub, LLC, Other Affiliate Central and Second Insurance Company for Publix Super Markets, Inc. (Moore, Jennifer) |
Filing 3 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint re the Notice of Removal by Publix Super Markets, Inc.. (Moore, Jennifer) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Panayotta Augustin-Birch is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (wce) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17101796, filed by Publix Super Markets, Inc. (No Answer/ Motion to Dismiss Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 state court file, #4 Notice of Filing Notice of Removal)(Moore, Jennifer) Modified Text on 11/28/2023 (wce). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Harrell v. Publix Super Markets, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Christina Harrell | |
Represented By: | Daniel H. Hunt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Publix Super Markets, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Jennifer Monrose Moore |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.