NAVAS MARTINEZ et al v. Blinken et al
| YEZID NAVAS MARTINEZ, MARIA MOGILEVSKAYA, BERENICE NAVAS MOGILEVSKAYA and IVANA NAVAS MOGILEVSKAYA |
| Secretary Antony J. Blinken, U.S. Department of State, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Antony Blinken and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION HEADQUARTERS |
| 0:2024cv60229 |
| February 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Raag Singhal |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney Brian J. Halliday. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 2/14/2024. (lp00)
|
| Filing 8 Amended MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Brian J. Halliday. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Amended/Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filed - Filing Fees Previously Paid. See #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, by MARIA MOGILEVSKAYA, YEZID NAVAS MARTINEZ, BERENICE NAVAS MOGILEVSKAYA, IVANA NAVAS MOGILEVSKAYA. Responses due by 2/27/2024. (Attachments: #1 Certification Certificate of Good Standing)(Hamaty-Bird, Gail) |
|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER denying without prejudice #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney Brian J. Halliday. Plaintiff is directed to file an amended motion including a certification that complies with Local Rule 4(b)(1), including that applicant has studied the Local Rules and has not filed more than three pro hac vice motions in different cases in this District within the last 365 days. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 2/13/2024. (lp00)
|
|
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER TO FILE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONSWithin SEVEN (7) DAYS of entry of an appearance, each party, including governmental parties, must file certificates of interested parties and corporate disclosure statements that contain a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party. The parties shall not include Judge Singhal or the paired magistrate judges unless they have an interest in the litigation. Throughout the pendency of the action, the parties are under a continuing obligation to amend, correct, and update the certificates. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 2/13/2024. (lp00)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions (and responses to motions) with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions (and responses).Parties are encouraged to seek extensions of time in a timely fashion. "A motion for extension of time is not self-executing; no motion is, unless expressly provided for by the applicable rule. Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle pending the Court's disposition of the motion, parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this." Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) (internal citations omitted).Exhibits to pleadings and motions shall be docketed in accordance with the Courts CM/ECF procedures, Rule 3L.(2): (2) Describing an Attachment to a Docket EntryA party filing an attachment to a document shall select one of the prescribed attachment categories from the drop-down menu (e.g., affidavit, transcript), provide an alphabetical or numerical designation (e.g., Exhibit A, Exhibit 1), and descriptively name each attachment (e.g., Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Boo Radley) in a manner that enables the Court to easily locate and distinguish attachments. (Emphasis added.) Local Rule 16.4, Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, requires that a Notice of Settlement "shall be filed and served jointly by counsel for all parties to the settlement." A unilateral notice of settlement will not stay pre-trial deadlines or hearings.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 2/13/2024. (lp00) |
| Filing 4 Plaintiff's MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Brian J. Halliday. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-17284660 by MARIA MOGILEVSKAYA, YEZID NAVAS MARTINEZ, BERENICE NAVAS MOGILEVSKAYA, IVANA NAVAS MOGILEVSKAYA. Responses due by 2/26/2024. (Attachments: #1 Certification Halliday Cert. Good Standing NDOH)(Hamaty-Bird, Gail) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Antony Blinken, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION HEADQUARTERS, U.S. Department of State, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (nwn) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal (nwn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Petition for Writ of Mandamus against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17282381, filed by IVANA NAVAS MOGILEVSKAYA, YEZID NAVAS MARTINEZ, BERENICE NAVAS MOGILEVSKAYA, MARIA MOGILEVSKAYA. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s) Blinken Summons, #2 Summon(s) Dept. of State Summons, #3 Summon(s) FBI Summons, #4 Summon(s) US Atty Summons, #5 Summon(s) AG Summons, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cvr Sheet, #7 Exhibit Marriage Cert., #8 Exhibit Birth Cert. Berenice, #9 Exhibit Birth Cert. Ivana, #10 Exhibit I-130 Approval Notice, #11 Exhibit Req. for Evidence, #12 Exhibit DS-260 Resub, #13 Exhibit Passport Maria Mogilevskaya, #14 Exhibit Passport Yezid Navas, #15 Exhibit Passport Berenice Navas, #16 Exhibit Passport Ivana Navas, #17 Exhibit Visa Bulletin Jul 2019, #18 Exhibit CEAC Conf. 7.22.20, #19 Exhibit Req. for expedite, #20 Exhibit High risk pregnancy, #21 Exhibit Expedite approved, #22 Exhibit IV Appt. conf., #23 Exhibit CV Mogilevskaya, #24 Exhibit Mogilevskaya Travel Itinerary, #25 Exhibit DOS IV Prioritization)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Hamaty-Bird, Gail) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
