EASYGROUP LTD v. ER TRAVEL, LLC et al
| EASYGROUP LTD |
| ER TRAVEL, LLC, PAUL HANLEY and TIMOTHY KOEHLER |
| 0:2024cv60638 |
| April 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodney Smith |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 44 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (pc) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to ER TRAVEL, LLC, PAUL HANLEY, TIMOTHY KOEHLER. (pc) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (pc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17461932, filed by EASYGROUP LTD. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Summon(s) Summons to ER Travel, LLC, #11 Summon(s) Summons to Paul Hanley, #12 Summon(s) Summons to Timothy Koehler)(Espinosa, Jorge) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
