Hofmann v. Jerico Pictures, Inc.
| Christopher Hofmann |
| Jerico Pictures, Inc. doing business as National Public Data |
| 0:2024cv61383 |
| August 1, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| David S Leibowitz |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Clerk's Entry of Default as to Jerico Pictures, Inc. - Motions Terminated: #12 Motion for Clerks Entry of Default Signed by DEPUTY CLERK on 9/23/2024. (drz) |
| Filing 12 Plaintiff's MOTION for Clerk's Entry of Default as to Jerico Pictures, Inc. by Christopher Hofmann. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Clerk's Default)(Ostrow, Jeffrey) |
Filing 11
ORDER denying without prejudice #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint. Signed by Judge David S. Leibowitz on 9/5/2024. See attached document for full details. (lsk)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Angelo Anthony Gasparri on behalf of Jerico Pictures, Inc. (Gasparri, Angelo) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer by Jerico Pictures, Inc.. Attorney Angelo Anthony Gasparri added to party Jerico Pictures, Inc.(pty:dft). (Gasparri, Angelo) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Christopher Hofmann. Jerico Pictures, Inc. served on 8/7/2024, response/answer due 8/28/2024. (Ostrow, Jeffrey) |
|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney(s) Brandon Jack ; granting #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney(s) M. Anderson Berry. Signed by Judge David S. Leibowitz (lsk)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for M. Anderson Berry. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-17739141 by Christopher Hofmann. Responses due by 8/21/2024. (Attachments: #1 Certification of M. Anderson Berry, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Ostrow, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Brandon Jack. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-17739091 by Christopher Hofmann. Responses due by 8/21/2024. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Brandon Jack, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Ostrow, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 4 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney M. Anderson Berry, Gregory Haroutunian, Brandon P. Jack, Jason M. Wucetich, mailing date August 2, 2024, (pt) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Jerico Pictures, Inc.. (ar24) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge David S. Leibowitz. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Panayotta Augustin-Birch is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (ar24) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Class Action against Jerico Pictures, Inc.. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17723501, filed by Christopher Hofmann. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(Ostrow, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
