RSM U.S. LLP v. Notes
| RSM U.S. LLP |
| Randolf Notes |
| 0:2024cv61860 |
| October 7, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| David S Leibowitz |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Defendant's REPLY to Response to Motion re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Complaint FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(6) filed by Randolf Notes. (Tisdahl, Elissa) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Complaint FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(6) filed by RSM U.S. LLP. Replies due by 11/19/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Davis, Benjamin) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Elissa Ann Tisdahl on behalf of Randolf Notes. Attorney Elissa Ann Tisdahl added to party Randolf Notes(pty:dft). (Tisdahl, Elissa) |
| Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Complaint FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(6) by Randolf Notes. Responses due by 11/12/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Byrne, Lawrence) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Lawrence William Byrne on behalf of Randolf Notes. Attorney Lawrence William Byrne added to party Randolf Notes(pty:dft). (Byrne, Lawrence) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by RSM U.S. LLP. Randolf Notes served on 10/16/2024, response/answer due 11/6/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Davis, Benjamin) |
| Filing 4 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney William F. Dugan and Jacob M. Kaplan, mailing date October 9, 2024, (pt) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Randolf Notes. (pc) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge David S. Leibowitz. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Panayotta Augustin-Birch is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (pc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Randolf Notes. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17892029, filed by RSM U.S. LLP. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Exhibit A)(Davis, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: RSM U.S. LLP v. Notes | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Randolf Notes | |
| Represented By: | Elissa Ann Tisdahl |
| Represented By: | Lawrence William Byrne |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: RSM U.S. LLP | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Cody Davis |
| Represented By: | William F. Dugan |
| Represented By: | Jacob M. Kaplan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
