Oakley v. Jacknow
Jayson Jacknow |
Charles Oakley |
0:2024cv61950 |
October 18, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Rodney Smith |
Assault Libel & Slander |
Motion to enforce deposition subpoena |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT. Case transferred from Florida Southern has been opened in Southern District of New York as case 1:24-cv-08384, filed 11/04/2024. (bb) |
SYSTEM ENTRY - Case 0:24-cv-61950 electronically transferred out to New York Southern. (pc) |
![]() |
Filing 8 Consent MOTION to Change Venue /Transfer this action to the Southern District of New York, Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to file opposition to Petitioner Charles Oakley's motion to compel (ECF No. 1) re #1 Petition/Motion (Complaint) RE: Subpoena from Another District, by Jayson Jacknow. Attorney Maria Makram Henain added to party Jayson Jacknow(pty:dft). Responses due by 11/15/2024. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order - Proposed Order Granting Respondent's Consent Motion to Transfer and Consent Motion for Extension of Time)(Henain, Maria) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for John Crain. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-17925828 by Charles Oakley. Responses due by 11/5/2024. (Fazio, Joseph) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Valdi Licul. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-17925802 by Charles Oakley. Responses due by 11/5/2024. (Fazio, Joseph) |
Filing 3 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney Valdi Licul and John S. Crain, mailing date October 21, 2024, (pt) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (pc) |
Filing 1 Petition/Motion (Complaint) RE: Subpoena to Enforce from Another District . Filing fee $52.00 receipt number AFLSDC-17919493, filed by Charles Oakley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Affidavit Declaration of Valdi Licul, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E)(Fazio, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Oakley v. Jacknow | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Charles Oakley | |
Represented By: | Joseph R. Fazio, III |
Represented By: | Valdi Licul |
Represented By: | John S. Crain |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Jayson Jacknow | |
Represented By: | Maria Makram Henain |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.