FLYHOPCO, LLC v. M/Y INDEPENDENCE, in rem et al
| FLYHOPCO, LLC d/b/a BRADFORD MARINE |
| M/Y INDEPENDENCE, a 1984 built, 106-foot Burger motor yacht bearing United States Coast Guard Official Number 669820, her engines, tackle, furnishings, and appurtenances, in rem and DUCKY-MOMO, LLC |
| 0:2024cv62210 |
| November 21, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| William P Dimitrouleas |
| Contract: Marine |
| 46 U.S.C. ยง 0741 Shipping |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER APPROVING VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL. Closing Case (Without Prejudice) Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 12/20/2024. See attached document for full details. (pc)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice by FLYHOPCO, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit M/Y Independence Payment Schedule to Bradford Marine - 12/18/24) (Stroup, James) |
Filing 3
ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO MEET, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 11/25/2024. See attached document for full details. (drz)
|
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (pc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Verified against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-18001553, filed by FLYHOPCO, LLC d/b/a BRADFORD MARINE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - U.S.C.G. Abstract of Title for M/Y Independence, #3 Exhibit 2 - Bradford Dockage and Repair Contract, #4 Exhibit 3 - Statement and Invoices for Necessaries Delivered to M/Y Independence)(Stroup, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: FLYHOPCO, LLC v. M/Y INDEPENDENCE, in rem et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: M/Y INDEPENDENCE, a 1984 built, 106-foot Burger motor yacht bearing United States Coast Guard Official Number 669820, her engines, tackle, furnishings, and appurtenances, in rem | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DUCKY-MOMO, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: FLYHOPCO, LLC d/b/a BRADFORD MARINE | |
| Represented By: | James Weller Stroup |
| Represented By: | Farris James Martin, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.