H.T. v. ByteDance Inc. et al
| H.T. |
| ByteDance Inc., ByteDance Ltd., TikTok Ltd., TikTok Inc., TikTok Pte. Ltd. and TikTok U.S. Data Security, Inc. |
| 0:2025cv60572 |
| March 25, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Default |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney James E. Cecchi, Jordan M. Steele, William J. Manory, mailing date March 26, 2025, (pt) |
| Filing 4 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Electronic Case. Case administratively closed - Wrong Venue selected by Filer. CASE HAS BEEN RENUMBERED, the new case number is 25CV14095. No further entries will be made on this case. (cwc) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (cwc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Class Action against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-18313363, filed by H.T.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ostrow, Jeffrey) Text Modified on 3/26/2025 (cwc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
