Kanter v. LegalShield Inc.
| Adam Kanter |
| LegalShield Inc. |
| 0:2025cv62056 |
| October 13, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| William P Dimitrouleas |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Transmittal Letter Sent with Order of Remand at DE #8 ] to: 17th Judicial Circuit Court, in and for Broward County. State Court Case Number: CACE-25-013708 (wce) |
Filing 8
ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT: The Clerk is directed to REMAND this case to state court. The Clerk is further directed to CLOSE this case and to DENY all pending motions as moot. Closing Case. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 11/12/2025. See attached document for full details. (wce)
|
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against LegalShield Inc., filed by Adam Kanter.(pcs) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #3 Order to Show Cause by LegalShield Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Jacobs, Greggory) |
| Filing 5 PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO #3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE JURISDICTIONAL AMOUNT by Adam Kanter. (wce) |
| Filing 4 MOTION TO DISMISS #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint), FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Brief in Support by LegalShield Inc.. Responses due by 11/3/2025. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(Jacobs, Greggory) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #1 Notice of Removal (State Court Complaint). Show Cause Response due by 10/21/2025. Signed by Judge William P. Dimitrouleas on 10/15/2025. See attached document for full details. (ls)
|
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-18866813, filed by LegalShield Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit - State Court Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit- State Court Summons, #4 Exhibit - Certificate of Service, #5 Exhibit - Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #6 Civil Cover Sheet. No Answer/Motion to Dismiss filed. )(Jacobs, Greggory) Modified Attachment Description on 10/14/2025 (nan). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kanter v. LegalShield Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Adam Kanter | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: LegalShield Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Greggory Emil Jacobs |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
