Sejour v. City of Margate, Florida et al
| William Sejour |
| Michael Gillam, City Of Margate Police Department and Florida League Of Cities, Inc. |
| 0:2025cv62082 |
| October 15, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Raag Singhal |
| Jared M Strauss |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) for failure to state a claim and as frivolous. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case and DENY AS MOOT any pending motions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 12/10/2025. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
|
| Filing 10 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal and Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss no longer assigned to case. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (drz) |
|
Filing 9
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #8 Motion to Reassign Case. In accordance with Administrative Order 2025-11, the Clerk shall randomly reassign this case to a District Judge, keeping the original Magistrate Judge assigned the case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss on 10/31/2025. (emd)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Reassignment to Article III District Judge by William Sejour. (ebz) Modified date filed on 10/31/2025 (ebz). |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by William Sejour. (ebz) Modified date filed on 10/31/2025 (ebz). |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Michael Gillam, City of Margate Police Department, Florida League of Cities, Inc. filed in response to Order Granting Motion for Leave, filed by William Sejour. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons)(ebz) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying without prejudice #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Amended Complaint due by 10/30/2025. Filing Fee OR Renewed Motion to Waive Filing Fee due by 10/30/2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss on 10/16/2025. See attached document for full details. (emd)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REGARDING MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION. Notice of Consent OR Motion for Case Reassignment due by 10/30/2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss on 10/16/2025. See attached document for full details. (emd)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by William Sejour. (blc) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (blc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Margate, Florida, Michael Gillam. Filing fees $ 405.00 Not Paid. IFP Filed, filed by William Sejour. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s))(blc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
