GUTIERREZ et al v. RUBIO et al
| SILVINA GUTIERREZ and ANDI BOO LLC |
| MARCO RUBIO, CHRISTOPHER LANDAU, JOHN ARMSTRONG, REED D RUBINSTEIN, PETER LAMELAS, HEIDI GOMEZ RAPALO and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE |
| 0:2025cv62672 |
| December 26, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Rodney Smith |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE. Any pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this action. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 2/3/2026. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice by ANDI BOO LLC, SILVINA GUTIERREZ (Clancy, Ryan) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings per DE 13 Order. Joint Scheduling Report due by 2/6/2026 (amb) |
Filing 13
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #12 Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Comply with January 2, 2026 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report, Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements. The parties shall file their Joint Scheduling Report, Certificates of Interested Parties and Corporate Disclosure Statements by February 6, 2026. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 1/26/2026. (cbn)
|
| Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to comply with January 2, 2026 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report re #11 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report, by ANDI BOO LLC, SILVINA GUTIERREZ. Responses due by 2/9/2026. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Text of Proposed Order Granting Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time)(Clancy, Ryan) |
Filing 11
ORDER REQUIRING JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT, CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS. Joint Scheduling Report due by 1/30/2026. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 1/2/2026. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
|
Filing 10
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Attorney Brian Green. Signed by Judge Rodney Smith on 1/1/2026. (cbn)
|
| Filing 9 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed by ANDI BOO LLC, SILVINA GUTIERREZ. MARCO RUBIO served on 12/30/2025, response/answer due 3/2/2026. (Clancy, Ryan) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Striking #7 Summons Returned Executed, filed by SILVINA GUTIERREZ by ANDI BOO LLC, SILVINA GUTIERREZ (Clancy, Ryan) |
| Filing 7 STRICKEN. SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint,,, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by SILVINA GUTIERREZ. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE served on 12/30/2025, response/answer due 1/20/2026. (Clancy, Ryan) Modified on per DE #8 Notice of Striking 12/31/2025 (ebz). |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Brian Green. Filing Fee $ 250.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-19080378 by ANDI BOO LLC, SILVINA GUTIERREZ. Responses due by 1/13/2026. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Clancy, Ryan) |
| Filing 5 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney Brian Scott Green, mailing date December 29, 2025, (pt) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by John Steven Leinicke on behalf of JOHN ARMSTRONG, PETER LAMELAS, CHRISTOPHER LANDAU, HEIDI GOMEZ RAPALO, REED D RUBINSTEIN, MARCO RUBIO, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE. Attorney John Steven Leinicke added to party JOHN ARMSTRONG(pty:dft), Attorney John Steven Leinicke added to party PETER LAMELAS(pty:dft), Attorney John Steven Leinicke added to party CHRISTOPHER LANDAU(pty:dft), Attorney John Steven Leinicke added to party HEIDI GOMEZ RAPALO(pty:dft), Attorney John Steven Leinicke added to party REED D RUBINSTEIN(pty:dft), Attorney John Steven Leinicke added to party MARCO RUBIO(pty:dft), Attorney John Steven Leinicke added to party U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE(pty:dft). (Leinicke, John) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to JOHN ARMSTRONG, PETER LAMELAS, CHRISTOPHER LANDAU, HEIDI GOMEZ RAPALO, REED D RUBINSTEIN, MARCO RUBIO, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Summon(s), #3 Summon(s), #4 Summon(s), #5 Summon(s), #6 Summon(s), #7 Summon(s))(ebz) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Rodney Smith. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (ebz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS against JOHN ARMSTRONG, PETER LAMELAS, CHRISTOPHER LANDAU, HEIDI GOMEZ RAPALO, REED D RUBINSTEIN, MARCO RUBIO, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-19071936, filed by ANDI BOO LLC, SILVINA GUTIERREZ. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - 214(b) Notification, #2 Exhibit B - DS-160 Confirmation, #3 Exhibit C - Excerpts of 9 FAM 402.9, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summon(s) Christopher Landau, #6 Summon(s) Heidi Gomez Rapalo, #7 Summon(s) John Armstrong, #8 Summon(s) Marco Rubio, #9 Summon(s) Pamela Jo Bondi, #10 Summon(s) Peter Lamelas, #11 Summon(s) Reed Rubinstein, #12 Summon(s) U.S. Attorney SDFL)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Clancy, Ryan) Modified text on 12/29/2025 (ebz). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.