Dicuru Antonetti v. MOCA Logistics & Industrial Solutions, Inc. et al
| Jesus Dicuru Antonetti |
| MOCA Logistics & Industrial Solutions, Inc. and Giancarlo Motta |
| 0:2026cv60177 |
| January 22, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Raag Singhal |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 28 Defendant's REPLY in Support of Motion re #26 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction . filed by Giancarlo Motta. (Greene, Nolan) |
| Filing 27 RESPONSE in Opposition re #26 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Jesus Dicuru Antonetti. Replies due by 5/1/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6)(Schickman, Katelyn) |
| Filing 26 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Giancarlo Motta. Responses due by 4/24/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Declaration of Giancarlo Motta in Support of His Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint)(Greene, Nolan) |
| Filing 25 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Amended Complaint with Jury Demand by MOCA Logistics & Industrial Solutions, Inc.. (Greene, Nolan) |
Filing 24
PAPERLESS ORDER denying #21 Defendant Giancarlo Motta's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction as MOOT in light of the #23 Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 3/31/2026. (rg01)
|
| Filing 23 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Jesus Dicuru Antonetti.(Schickman, Katelyn) |
| Filing 22 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by MOCA Logistics & Industrial Solutions, Inc.. (Greene, Nolan) |
| Filing 21 First MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction by Giancarlo Motta. Responses due by 3/27/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Declaration of Giancarlo Motta)(Greene, Nolan) |
|
Filing 20
ORDER granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint. Defendants MOCA Logistics & Industrial Solutions, Inc. and Giancarlo Motta shall respond to the Complaint by 3/13/2026. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 3/12/2026. See attached document for full details. (rg01)
|
| Filing 19 First NOTICE of Amended Certificate of Conferral by MOCA Logistics & Industrial Solutions, Inc., Giancarlo Motta (Greene, Nolan) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER EXPEDITING RESPONSE re #17 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer to Complaint filed by Giancarlo Motta, MOCA Logistics & Industrial Solutions, Inc., ( Responses due by 3/12/2026.) Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 3/10/2026. See attached document for full details. (ksr)
|
| Filing 17 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer to Complaint by MOCA Logistics & Industrial Solutions, Inc., Giancarlo Motta. Responses due by 3/23/2026. (Greene, Nolan) |
|
Filing 16
PAPERLESS ORDER granting Defendant Giancarlo Motta's #15 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant Motta's response to the Complaint is due by 3/9/2026. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 2/23/2026. (rg01)
|
| Filing 15 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer to Complaint by MOCA Logistics & Industrial Solutions, Inc., Giancarlo Motta. Responses due by 3/9/2026. (Greene, Nolan) |
| Filing 14 CLERK'S NOTICE - Attorney Admissions has accepted the address information change request as submitted through attorneys PACER account for attorney Nolan Thompson Greene re #13 Notice of Change of Address, Email or Law Firm Name, (pt) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Change of Address/Contact Information; Change of Email; by Nolan Thompson Greene. Attorney Nolan Thompson Greene added to party Giancarlo Motta(pty:dft). Attorney Nolan Thompson Greene added to party Giancarlo Motta(pty:dft). (Greene, Nolan) |
|
Filing 12
PAPERLESS ORDER granting in part and denying in part #10 Defendant Moca Logistics & Industrial Solutions, Inc.'s Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Absent good cause shown, Defendant Moca Logistics shall respond to the complaint on or before March 10, 2026. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 2/17/2026. (rg01)
|
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Jesus Dicuru Antonetti. MOCA Logistics & Industrial Solutions, Inc. waiver sent on 2/17/2026, response/answer due 4/20/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Waiver of Service - MOCA (Executed))(Schickman, Katelyn) |
| Filing 10 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint by MOCA Logistics & Industrial Solutions, Inc.. Attorney Nolan Thompson Greene added to party MOCA Logistics & Industrial Solutions, Inc.(pty:dft). Responses due by 3/2/2026. (Greene, Nolan) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Jesus Dicuru Antonetti. Giancarlo Motta served on 2/2/2026, response/answer due 2/23/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Return of Service)(Schickman, Katelyn) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Jesus Dicuru Antonetti. MOCA Logistics & Industrial Solutions, Inc. served on 1/26/2026, response/answer due 2/17/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Return of Service)(Schickman, Katelyn) |
| Filing 7 Plaintiff's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Jesus Dicuru Antonetti (Schickman, Katelyn) |
|
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER TO FILE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS. Within SEVEN (7) DAYS of entry of an appearance, each party, including governmental parties, must file certificates of interested parties and corporate disclosure statements that contain a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party. The parties shall not include Judge Singhal or the paired magistrate judges unless they have an interest in the litigation. Throughout the pendency of the action, the parties are under a continuing obligation to amend, correct, and update the certificates. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 1/27/2026. (rg01)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions (and responses to motions) with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions (and responses). Motions for Extension of Time Parties are encouraged to seek extensions of time in a timely fashion. "A motion for extension of time is not self-executing; no motion is, unless expressly provided for by the applicable rule. Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle pending the Court's disposition of the motion, parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this." Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) (internal citations omitted). Labeling Exhibits on CM/ECF Exhibits to pleadings and motions shall be docketed in accordance with the Court's CM/ECF procedures, Rule 3L.(2): (2) Describing an Attachment to a Docket EntryA party filing an attachment to a document shall select one of the prescribed attachment categories from the drop-down menu (e.g., affidavit, transcript), provide an alphabetical or numerical designation (e.g., Exhibit A, Exhibit 1), and descriptively name each attachment (e.g., Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Boo Radley) in a manner that enables the Court to easily locate and distinguish attachments. (Emphasis added.) Notices of Settlement Local Rule 16.4, Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, requires that a Notice of Settlement "shall be filed and served jointly by counsel for all parties to the settlement." A unilateral notice of settlement will not stay pre-trial deadlines or hearings.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 1/27/2026. (rg01) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Katelyn Schickman on behalf of Jesus Dicuru Antonetti. Attorney Katelyn Schickman added to party Jesus Dicuru Antonetti(pty:pla). (Schickman, Katelyn) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to MOCA Logistics & Industrial Solutions, Inc., Giancarlo Motta. (ksr) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (ksr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-19146173, filed by Jesus Dicuru Antonetti. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s) Summons - MOCA, #3 Summon(s) Summons - Giancarlo)(Pollock, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
