Luxottica Group S.p.A. v. ccllaa.shop
Plaintiff: Luxottica Group S.p.A.
Defendant: ccllaa.shop, ccllbb.shop, ccllpp.shop, goodservi.shop and unllam.shop
Case Number: 0:2026cv60309
Filed: February 4, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Donald M Middlebrooks
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 25 PAPERLESS ORDER denying without prejudice (DE 20) Defendant's Motion to Vacate. The Motion is facially deficient for failure to confer as required by Local Rule 7.1(a)(2). Conferral is mandatory. Defendant may re-file this motion, but any renewed motion must strictly comply with Local Rules. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 7/2/2026. (ml00)
July 1, 2026 Filing 24 NOTICE of Filing by ccllaa.shop re #22 Affidavit, #23 Certificate of Service, #20 MOTION to Vacate #18 Default Judgment, Permanent Injunction MOTION to Stay, #21 Exhibit Index (ls)
July 1, 2026 Filing 23 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by ccllaa.shop re #22 Affidavit, #20 MOTION to Vacate #18 Default Judgment, Permanent Injunction MOTION to Stay, #21 Exhibit Index (ls)
July 1, 2026 Filing 22 AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION signed by: Chan, Mei Sik May re #20 MOTION to Vacate #18 Default Judgment, Permanent Injunction MOTION to Stay by ccllaa.shop (ls)
July 1, 2026 Filing 21 Exhibit Index by ccllaa.shop.. (ls)
July 1, 2026 Filing 20 MOTION to Vacate #18 Default Judgment, Permanent Injunction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4), or in the Alternative Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1); (Responses due by 7/15/2026.), with Integrated Emergency MOTION to Stay Execution under Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(b) by ccllaa.shop. (ls)
June 3, 2026 Filing 19 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (Attachments: #1 Supplement Default Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction) (ls)
June 3, 2026 Filing 18 DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT and PERMANENT INJUNCTION in favor of Luxottica Group S.p.A. against ccllaa.shop; Closing Case. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 6/3/2026. See attached document for full details. (ls)
June 3, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER granting #16 Motion for Default Final Judgment. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 6/3/2026. See attached document for full details. (ls)
April 8, 2026 Filing 16 Plaintiff's MOTION for Default Judgment Against Defendant and Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof by Luxottica Group S.p.A.. Responses due by 4/22/2026. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jason Groppe in Support Thereof, #2 Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Jason Groppe, #3 Declaration of T. Raquel Wiborg-Rodriguez in Support Thereof, #4 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion for Default Final Judgment, #5 Text of Proposed Order Default Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction)(Wiborg-Rodriguez, T.)
March 30, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 15 PAPERLESS ORDER REGARDING DEFAULT JUDGMENT PROCEDURES. On March 27, 2026, Plaintiff moved for Clerk's Entry of Default against Defendant (DE #13 ). The motion was granted on March 30, 2026. (DE 14 ). Accordingly, if Plaintiff intends to move for default final judgment, he must do so on or before April 13, 2026. Moreover, Plaintiff is advised that pursuant to S.D. Fla. Local Rule 7.1(a)(2), motions for default judgment must be "accompanied by a proposed order that is filed and submitted via e-mail to the Court as prescribed by Section 3I(6) of the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures." The proposed order must contain legal analysis as to the claims on which Plaintiff is seeking default final judgment and how the pled facts, taken as true, justify awarding Plaintiff default judgment. Plaintiff must ensure that the proposed order with the court is emailed in Word format to the court's e-filing address: [email protected]. If no timely motion and appropriate proposed order are filed, this matter is subject to dismissal without prejudice. Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 3/30/2026. (kid)
March 30, 2026 Filing 14 PAPERLESS ORDER by Clerk of Entry of Default re #13 Motion for Clerk's Entry of Default as to ccllaa.shop. Signed by DEPUTY CLERK on 3/30/2026. (ls)
March 27, 2026 Filing 13 Plaintiff's MOTION for Clerk's Entry of Default as to ccllaa.shop by Luxottica Group S.p.A.. Responses due by 4/10/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of Stephen M. Gaffigan in Support of Request for Clerk's Entry of Default, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Gaffigan, Stephen)
March 16, 2026 Filing 12 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Luxottica Group S.p.A.. ccllaa.shop served on 3/3/2026, response/answer due 3/24/2026. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service, #2 Affidavit of Service)(Gaffigan, Stephen)
March 2, 2026 Filing 11 Summons Issued as to ccllaa.shop. (ls)
February 27, 2026 Filing 10 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Luxottica Group S.p.A. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons) (Wiborg-Rodriguez, T.)
February 27, 2026 Filing 9 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) will not be issued. The party(ies) on the summons(es) does not match the initiating documents. Filer may file a Notice of Filing Proposed Summons(es) with the corrected summons attached. (ls)
February 27, 2026 Filing 8 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Luxottica Group S.p.A. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons) (Wiborg-Rodriguez, T.)
February 26, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Order Authorizing Alternate Service of Process on Defendant Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f)(3). Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 2/26/2026. See attached document for full details. (ls)
February 20, 2026 Filing 6 Plaintiff's MOTION for Order Authorizing Alternate Service of Process on Defendant Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f)(3) and Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof by Luxottica Group S.p.A.. Responses due by 3/6/2026. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of T. Raquel Wiborg-Rodriguez in Support Thereof, #2 Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of T. Raquel Wiborg-Rodriguez, #3 Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of T. Raquel Wiborg-Rodriguez, #4 Declaration of Kathleen Burns in Support Thereof, #5 Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Kathleen Burns, #6 Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Kathleen Burns, #7 Declaration of Huang Yu Ting in Support Thereof, #8 Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Huang Yu Ting, #9 Text of Proposed Order)(Wiborg-Rodriguez, T.)
February 20, 2026 Filing 5 Plaintiff's NOTICE of Identification of Additional Aliases by Luxottica Group S.p.A. (Wiborg-Rodriguez, T.)
February 20, 2026 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Luxottica Group S.p.A. identifying Corporate Parent EssilorLuxottica S.A. for Luxottica Group S.p.A. (Wiborg-Rodriguez, T.)
February 5, 2026 Filing 3 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (blc)
February 4, 2026 Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Panayotta Augustin-Birch is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (blc)
February 4, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-19186713, filed by Luxottica Group S.p.A.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 to Complaint Certificates of Registration for the Ray-Ban Trademarks)(Gaffigan, Stephen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Luxottica Group S.p.A. v. ccllaa.shop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ccllaa.shop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ccllbb.shop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ccllpp.shop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: goodservi.shop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: unllam.shop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Luxottica Group S.p.A.
Represented By: Stephen Michael Gaffigan
Represented By: Virgilio Gigante
Represented By: T. Raquel Wiborg-Rodriguez
Represented By: Olga Zaynetdinova
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?