Viera v. Apotex Corp.
| Eneida Viera |
| Apotex Corp. |
| 0:2026cv60490 |
| February 23, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Raag Singhal |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 27
ORDER SETTING PRETRIAL DEADLINES. (Amended Pleadings due by 5/29/2026., Discovery due by 10/7/2026., Expert Discovery due by 10/7/2026., Joinder of Parties due by 5/29/2026., Dispositive Motions due by 10/22/2026., In Limine Motions due by 11/25/2026., Motions due by 10/22/2026., Pretrial Stipulation due by 1/6/2027.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss on 4/23/2026. See attached document for full details. (emd)
|
Filing 26
PAPERLESS ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. By 5/7/2026, the parties shall select a mediator pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, shall schedule a time, date, and place for mediation, and shall jointly file a notice and proposed order scheduling mediation via CM/ECF in the form specified on the Court's website, http://www.flsd.uscourts.gov. The parties shall complete mediation by 10/9/2026. If the parties cannot agree on a mediator, they shall notify the Clerk in writing as soon as possible, and the Clerk shall designate a certified mediator on a blind rotation basis. Counsel for all parties shall familiarize themselves with and adhere to all provisions of Local Rule 16.2. Within three (3) days of mediation, the parties are required to file a mediation report with the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss on 4/23/2026. (emd)
|
Filing 25
DISCOVERY PROCEDURES ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss on 4/23/2026. See attached document for full details. (emd)
|
Filing 24
ORDER SETTING TRIAL, GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS, AND REFERRING CERTAIN MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE: (Jury Trial set for 1/25/2027 09:00 AM in Fort Lauderdale Division before Judge Raag Singhal., Calendar Call set for 1/20/2027 02:00 PM via Zoom before Judge Raag Singhal.), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss for discovery matters and to hold a Scheduling Conference. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 4/22/2026. See attached document for full details. (pc) #Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
|
| Filing 23 Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 16.1 by Apotex Corp. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Gutierrez, Giselle) |
| Filing 22 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Apotex Corp. identifying Corporate Parent Apotex Inc. for Apotex Corp. (Fors, Patricia) |
| Filing 21 Clerk's Notice to Filer re #20 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement. Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents Not Entered; ERROR - The Filer failed to enter all Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents from the Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement. Filer is instructed to refile their Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement and enter the missing Other Affiliates/Corp Parents. Note - Other Affiliates/Corporate Parents do not appear on the docket sheet. (Elliot Kozolchyk, Esq. is not listed in the case). (pc) |
| Filing 20 Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement by Apotex Corp. identifying Corporate Parent Apotex Inc. for Apotex Corp. (Fors, Patricia) |
| Filing 19 CLERK'S NOTICE - Attorney Admissions has accepted the address and email information change requests as submitted through attorneys PACER account for attorney Patricia Ann Fors (pt) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Change of Address/Contact Information; Change of Email; Change of Law Firm Name; by Patricia Ann Fors (Fors, Patricia) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Change of Address/Contact Information; Change of Email; Change of Law Firm Name; by Patricia Ann Fors (Fors, Patricia) |
| Filing 16 REPLY in Support of Motion re #12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . filed by Apotex Corp.. (Fors, Patricia) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Patricia Ann Fors on behalf of Apotex Corp.. Attorney Patricia Ann Fors added to party Apotex Corp.(pty:dft). (Fors, Patricia) |
Filing 14
Order Setting Settlement Conference via Zoom for 5/18/2026 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss. Joint Notice of Compliance & Confidential Settlement Statements due by 5/11/2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss on 4/7/2026. See attached document for full details. (emd)
|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Eneida Viera. Replies due by 4/14/2026. (Cuthbertson, Dillon) |
| Filing 12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Apotex Corp.. Responses due by 4/16/2026. (Gutierrez, Giselle) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Eneida Viera. Apotex Corp. served on 2/26/2026, response/answer due 4/2/2026. (Cuthbertson, Dillon) |
Filing 10
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #9 Defendant, Apotex Corp.'s, Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant shall respond to the Complaint by April 2, 2026. While this is a very new case and the Court recognizes there is work to be done to resolve the parties' differences, the Court cautions the parties that eleventh-hour motions for extension of time are disfavored in this Court and a basis for denial of same. See Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) ("A motion for extension of time is not self-executing; no motion is, unless expressly provided for by the applicable rule. Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle 'pending the Court's disposition of the motion,' parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this.") (internal citations omitted). Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 3/20/2026. (rg01)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer to Complaint by Apotex Corp.. Attorney Giselle Gutierrez added to party Apotex Corp.(pty:dft). Responses due by 4/2/2026. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME)(Gutierrez, Giselle) |
| Filing 8 Statement of: Claim by Eneida Viera re #6 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Statement of Claim)(Cuthbertson, Dillon) |
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER Requiring Submission of Proposed Dates for Settlement Conference. The District Court has entered an Order, DE #6 , referring the case to me for a settlement conference. Accordingly, counsel for the parties shall promptly meet and confer to determine possible dates on which to conduct the settlement conference. Within 5 days after defense counsel appears in this case, Plaintiff's counsel shall email my chambers at [email protected] with at least 3 dates on which the parties and their counsel are available for the settlement conference, within any time period mandated by the District Court's Order, DE #6 . If the parties fail to timely submit proposed dates, the Court will select the date and time of the settlement conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss on 2/25/2026. (emd)
|
Filing 6
ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING REPORT, STATEMENT OF CLAIM AND RESPONSE, AND REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 2/24/2026. See attached document for full details. (pc)
|
Filing 5
PAPERLESS ORDER TO FILE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS. Within SEVEN (7) DAYS of entry of an appearance, each party, including governmental parties, must file certificates of interested parties and corporate disclosure statements that contain a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party. The parties shall not include Judge Singhal or the paired magistrate judges unless they have an interest in the litigation. Throughout the pendency of the action, the parties are under a continuing obligation to amend, correct, and update the certificates. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 2/24/2026. (rg01)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions (and responses to motions) with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions (and responses). Motions for Extension of Time Parties are encouraged to seek extensions of time in a timely fashion. "A motion for extension of time is not self-executing; no motion is, unless expressly provided for by the applicable rule. Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle pending the Court's disposition of the motion, parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this." Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) (internal citations omitted). Labeling Exhibits on CM/ECF Exhibits to pleadings and motions shall be docketed in accordance with the Court's CM/ECF procedures, Rule 3L.(2): (2) Describing an Attachment to a Docket EntryA party filing an attachment to a document shall select one of the prescribed attachment categories from the drop-down menu (e.g., affidavit, transcript), provide an alphabetical or numerical designation (e.g., Exhibit A, Exhibit 1), and descriptively name each attachment (e.g., Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Boo Radley) in a manner that enables the Court to easily locate and distinguish attachments. (Emphasis added.) Notices of Settlement Local Rule 16.4, Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, requires that a Notice of Settlement "shall be filed and served jointly by counsel for all parties to the settlement." A unilateral notice of settlement will not stay pre-trial deadlines or hearings.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 2/24/2026. (rg01) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Apotex Corp. (wce) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (wce) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-19245478, filed by Eneida Viera. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Statement of Claim)(Cuthbertson, Dillon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Viera v. Apotex Corp. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eneida Viera | |
| Represented By: | Dillon Scott Cuthbertson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Apotex Corp. | |
| Represented By: | Patricia Ann Fors |
| Represented By: | Giselle Gutierrez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.