Boyzo v. La Lupe Mexican Restaurant, LLC et al
| MARIA DE JESUS BOYZO |
| LA LUPE MEXICAN RESTAURANT, LLC and BRYANT FAJARDO |
| 0:2026cv61259 |
| April 28, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Raag Singhal |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Maria De Jesus Boyzo (Lopez, Maria) |
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Maria De Jesus Boyzo. La Lupe Mexican Restaurant, LLC waiver sent on 4/29/2026, response/answer due 6/29/2026. (Lopez, Maria) |
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Maria De Jesus Boyzo. Bryant Fajardo waiver sent on 4/29/2026, response/answer due 6/29/2026. (Lopez, Maria) |
| Filing 11 Statement of: CLAIM by Maria De Jesus Boyzo re #6 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report,, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, (Eliassin, Shedwin) |
Filing 10
PAPERLESS ORDER striking #9 Notice of Substitution of Counsel and Responsibility Within Same Firm and Notice of Designated Email. See S.D. Fla. L.R. 11.1(d)(3)(A) ("[N]o attorney shall withdraw the attorney's appearance in any action or proceeding except by leave of Court after notice served on the attorney's client and opposing counsel."). Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 5/11/2026. (rg01)
|
| Attorney Sara Luisa Cortes representing Boyzo, Maria De Jesus (Plaintiff) terminated. (ls)(per DE #9) |
| Filing 9 STRICKEN NOTICE/STIPULATION of Substitution of Counsel by Maria Lopez on behalf of Maria De Jesus Boyzo instead of prior counsel of record Sara L Cortes. . Attorney Maria Lopez added to party Maria De Jesus Boyzo(pty:pla). (Lopez, Maria) Modified on 5/12/2026 (cqs). Per DE 10 . |
| Filing 8 Plaintiff's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Maria De Jesus Boyzo (Cortes, Sara) |
|
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER Requiring Submission of Proposed Dates for Settlement Conference. The District Court has entered an Order, DE #6 , referring the case to me for a settlement conference. Accordingly, counsel for the parties shall promptly meet and confer to determine possible dates on which to conduct the settlement conference. Within 5 days after defense counsel appears in this case, Plaintiff's counsel shall email my chambers at [email protected] with at least 3 dates on which the parties and their counsel are available for the settlement conference, within any time period mandated by the District Court's Order, DE #6 . If the parties fail to timely submit proposed dates, the Court will select the date and time of the settlement conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss on 5/1/2026. (jva)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING REPORT, STATEMENT OF CLAIM AND RESPONSE, AND REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss for purposes of a settlement conference. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 4/29/2026. See attached document for full details. (jas)
|
|
Filing 5
PAPERLESS ORDER TO FILE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS. Within SEVEN (7) DAYS of entry of an appearance, each party, including governmental parties, must file certificates of interested parties and corporate disclosure statements that contain a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party. The parties shall not include Judge Singhal or the paired magistrate judges unless they have an interest in the litigation. Throughout the pendency of the action, the parties are under a continuing obligation to amend, correct, and update the certificates. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 4/29/2026. (rg01)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions (and responses to motions) with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions (and responses). Motions for Extension of Time Parties are encouraged to seek extensions of time in a timely fashion. "A motion for extension of time is not self-executing; no motion is, unless expressly provided for by the applicable rule. Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle pending the Court's disposition of the motion, parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this." Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) (internal citations omitted). Labeling Exhibits on CM/ECF Exhibits to pleadings and motions shall be docketed in accordance with the Court's CM/ECF procedures, Rule 3L.(2): (2) Describing an Attachment to a Docket EntryA party filing an attachment to a document shall select one of the prescribed attachment categories from the drop-down menu (e.g., affidavit, transcript), provide an alphabetical or numerical designation (e.g., Exhibit A, Exhibit 1), and descriptively name each attachment (e.g., Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Boo Radley) in a manner that enables the Court to easily locate and distinguish attachments. (Emphasis added.) Notices of Settlement Local Rule 16.4, Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, requires that a Notice of Settlement "shall be filed and served jointly by counsel for all parties to the settlement." A unilateral notice of settlement will not stay pre-trial deadlines or hearings.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 4/29/2026. (rg01) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to BRYANT FAJARDO, LA LUPE MEXICAN RESTAURANT, LLC. (scn) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (scn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BRYANT FAJARDO, LA LUPE MEXICAN RESTAURANT, LLC. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-19479569, filed by MARIA DE JESUS BOYZO. (Attachments: #1 Summon(s), #2 Summon(s), #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Eliassin, Shedwin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
