Reyes v. UMT Marine, LLC et al
| Christian Andres Reyes |
| UMT Marine, LLC and Juan E. Salazar |
| 0:2026cv61348 |
| May 5, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Raag Singhal |
| Jared M Strauss |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 26 NOTICE of Compliance by Christian Andres Reyes re #6 Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report,, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, (Cuthbertson, Dillon) |
| Filing 25 Plaintiff's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Christian Andres Reyes (Cuthbertson, Dillon) |
| Filing 24 NOTICE of Striking Docket Entry 13 by Juan E. Salazar, UMT Marine, LLC (Unruh, Jesse) |
| Filing 23 Defendants' ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Juan E. Salazar, UMT Marine, LLC. (Unruh, Jesse) |
| Filing 22 Initial Disclosure(s) by Juan E. Salazar, UMT Marine, LLC (Unruh, Jesse) |
| Filing 21 CLERK'S NOTICE - Attorney Admissions has accepted the address information change request as submitted through attorneys PACER account for attorney Jesse Ian Unruh (pt) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Change of Address/Contact Information; by Jesse Ian Unruh (Unruh, Jesse) |
Filing 19
ORDER granting #16 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants' deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Statement of Claim is EXTENDED to July 15, 2026. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 6/23/2026. See attached document for full details. (gqa)
|
Filing 18
Order Setting Settlement Conference via Zoom for 8/24/2026 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss. Confidential Settlement Statements & Joint Notice of Compliance due by 8/17/2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss on 6/17/2026. See attached document for full details. (emd)
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Monica A. Monsalve-Burr on behalf of Juan E. Salazar, UMT Marine, LLC. Attorney Monica A. Monsalve-Burr added to party Juan E. Salazar(pty:dft), Attorney Monica A. Monsalve-Burr added to party UMT Marine, LLC(pty:dft). (Monsalve-Burr, Monica) |
| Filing 16 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Statement of Claim and Complete Service of Related Documents by Juan E. Salazar, UMT Marine, LLC. Responses due by 6/29/2026. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Unruh, Jesse) |
| Filing 15 Defendant's Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Juan E. Salazar, UMT Marine, LLC (Unruh, Jesse) |
| Filing 14 Notice of NO Pending, Refiled, Related or Similar Actions by Juan E. Salazar, UMT Marine, LLC (Unruh, Jesse) |
| Filing 13 STRICKEN - NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jesse Ian Unruh on behalf of Juan E. Salazar, UMT Marine, LLC (Unruh, Jesse) Per DE #24 Modified on 7/1/2026 (gqa). |
Filing 12
PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING #11 Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendants shall respond to the Complaint by July 2, 2026. While the Court grants the Motion for Extension of Time, it cautions the parties that eleventh-hour motions for extension of time are disfavored in this Court and a basis for denial of same. See Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) ("A motion for extension of time is not self-executing; no motion is, unless expressly provided for by the applicable rule. Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle 'pending the Court's disposition of the motion,' parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this.") (internal citations omitted). Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 6/12/2026. (rg01)
|
| Filing 11 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer by Juan E. Salazar, UMT Marine, LLC. Attorney Jesse Ian Unruh added to party Juan E. Salazar(pty:dft), Attorney Jesse Ian Unruh added to party UMT Marine, LLC(pty:dft). Responses due by 6/25/2026. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Unruh, Jesse) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on #1 Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Christian Andres Reyes. UMT Marine, LLC served on 5/21/2026, response/answer due 6/11/2026. (Cuthbertson, Dillon) |
| Filing 9 Statement of: Claim by Christian Andres Reyes (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Statement of Claim)(Cuthbertson, Dillon) |
| Filing 8 Statement of: Claim by Christian Andres Reyes (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Statement of Claim)(Cuthbertson, Dillon) |
Filing 7
PAPERLESS ORDER Requiring Submission of Proposed Dates for Settlement Conference. The District Court has entered an Order, DE #6 , referring the case to me for a settlement conference. Accordingly, counsel for the parties shall promptly meet and confer to determine possible dates on which to conduct the settlement conference. Within 5 days after defense counsel appears in this case, Plaintiff's counsel shall email my chambers at [email protected] with at least 3 dates on which the parties and their counsel are available for the settlement conference, within any time period mandated by the District Court's Order, DE #6 . If the parties fail to timely submit proposed dates, the Court will select the date and time of the settlement conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss on 5/7/2026. (emd)
|
Filing 6
ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING REPORT, STATEMENT OF CLAIM AND RESPONSE, AND REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss for settlement conference. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 5/6/2026. See attached document for full details. (gqa)
|
Filing 5
PAPERLESS ORDER TO FILE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS. Within SEVEN (7) DAYS of entry of an appearance, each party, including governmental parties, must file certificates of interested parties and corporate disclosure statements that contain a complete list of persons, associated persons, firms, partnerships, or corporations that have a financial interest in the outcome of this case, including subsidiaries, conglomerates, affiliates, parent corporations, and other identifiable legal entities related to a party. The parties shall not include Judge Singhal or the paired magistrate judges unless they have an interest in the litigation. Throughout the pendency of the action, the parties are under a continuing obligation to amend, correct, and update the certificates. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 5/6/2026. (rg01)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICEUnless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall: be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using either Times New Roman or Arial typeface. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court cautions parties against excessive use of footnotes.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions (and responses to motions) with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position. If conflicts of position exist, parties shall explain the conflicts in their separate motions (and responses). Motions for Extension of Time Parties are encouraged to seek extensions of time in a timely fashion. "A motion for extension of time is not self-executing; no motion is, unless expressly provided for by the applicable rule. Yet, by filing these motions on or near the last day, and then sitting idle pending the Court's disposition of the motion, parties essentially grant their own motion. The Court will not condone this." Compere v. Nusret Miami, LLC, 2020 WL 2844888, at *2 (S.D. Fla. May 7, 2020) (internal citations omitted). Labeling Exhibits on CM/ECF Exhibits to pleadings and motions shall be docketed in accordance with the Court's CM/ECF procedures, Rule 3L.(2): (2) Describing an Attachment to a Docket EntryA party filing an attachment to a document shall select one of the prescribed attachment categories from the drop-down menu (e.g., affidavit, transcript), provide an alphabetical or numerical designation (e.g., Exhibit A, Exhibit 1), and descriptively name each attachment (e.g., Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Boo Radley) in a manner that enables the Court to easily locate and distinguish attachments. (Emphasis added.) Notices of Settlement Local Rule 16.4, Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, requires that a Notice of Settlement "shall be filed and served jointly by counsel for all parties to the settlement." A unilateral notice of settlement will not stay pre-trial deadlines or hearings.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. Signed by Judge Raag Singhal on 5/6/2026. (rg01) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Juan E. Salazar, UMT Marine, LLC. (gqa) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (gqa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-19508444, filed by Christian Andres Reyes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s), #3 Exhibit A - Plaintiff's Statement of Claim)(Cuthbertson, Dillon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.