CNP 2734 Ventures LLC v. Johnson Holdings Group LLC et al
| CNP 2734 Ventures LLC |
| Johnson Holdings Group LLC, DMR Management NY Corp., City of Hollywood, Secure Windows & Doors, Inc., Haim S. Segal and Any Unknown Tenants in Possession |
| 0:2026cv61544 |
| May 26, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Patrick M Hunt |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Filing in Support of Motion to Remand and Motion to Abstain by CNP 2734 Ventures LLC re #6 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand to State Court and Motion to Abstain (Luna, Laudy) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Judge to decide first-filed Ominibus Motion DE #5 before, or together with Plaintiff's Motion to Remand DE #6 and in all events, enter no remand until the Omnibus Motion is decided re #6 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand to State Court and Motion to Abstain, #5 MOTION to Set Aside by Haim S. Segal. Responses due by 7/7/2026. (drz) |
| Filing 10 Plaintiff's REPLY in Support of Motion re #6 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand to State Court and Motion to Abstain. filed by CNP 2734 Ventures LLC. (Luna, Laudy) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand and Motion to Abstain filed by Haim S. Segal. Replies due by 6/18/2026. (drz) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Filing in Support of Motion to Remand and Motion to Abstain by CNP 2734 Ventures LLC re #6 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand to State Court and Motion to Abstain (Luna, Laudy) |
Filing 7
ORDER REGARDING MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt on 6/5/2026. See attached document for full details. (hhr)
|
| Filing 6 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand to State Court and Motion to Abstain by CNP 2734 Ventures LLC. Attorney Laudy Luna added to party CNP 2734 Ventures LLC(pty:pla). Responses due by 6/22/2026. (Luna, Laudy) |
| Filing 5 OMNIBUS MOTION to Set Aside Void Clerk's Default; To Quash Service and Dismiss Under Fed. R. Civ.P.12(b)(5);To Confirm the Automatic Stay; and to Dismiss Under Fed.R.CIV.P.12(b)(7) and 19 or, In the Alternative, to Transfer Venue to The Southern District of New York, with Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Haim S. Segal. Responses due by 6/12/2026. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Haim S. Segal, #2 Proposed Order)(drz) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL against CNP 2734 Ventures LLC, filed by Haim S. Segal.(drz) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 5/26/2026 in the amount of $ 405.00, receipt number 22079. (blc) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (blc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - 17th Judicial Circuit) Filing fee $405.00. Receipt#: 22079, filed by Haim S. Segal. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit 2 - State Court Filings, #4 Exhibit 3 - State Court Filings, #5 Exhibit 4 - State Court Filings, #6 Exhibit 5 - State Court Answer p. 56, #7 Exhibit 6 - State Court Filings)(blc). Modified text on 5/26/2026 (blc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
