MARQUEZ VIEIRA v. WARDEN, BROWARD TRANSITIONAL CENTER et al
| DANIEL ALEJANDRO MARQUEZ VIEIRA |
| WARDEN, BROWARD TRANSITIONAL CENTER, DAVID VENTURELLA, MARKWAYNE MULLIN, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Todd Blanche and GARRETT RIPA |
| 0:2026cv61872 |
| July 7, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| William P Dimitrouleas |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge William P. Dimitrouleas. (kpe) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus . Filing fee $ 5.00 receipt number AFLSDC-19724386, filed by DANIEL ALEJANDRO MARQUEZ VIEIRA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit ICE Locator, #3 Exhibit Biographical Documentation, #4 Exhibit I-94, #5 Exhibit TPS approval and NTPS Alliance membership, #6 Exhibit work permit cat a12, #7 Exhibit TPS Re-registration, #8 Exhibit Form I-765 Receipt Notice 2025, #9 Exhibit Form I-130 Receipt Notice, #10 Exhibit Form I-485 Receipt Notice, #11 Exhibit Certified Disposition Criminal Case, #12 Exhibit Police Search Record, #13 Exhibit Fifth Circuit Decision Sosnava Rodriguez v Ortega)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (Guerrero-Barboza, Gustavo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.