Cabrera Medrano v. Field Office Director et al
| Brianda Cabrera Medrano |
| Field Office Director and Joseph B. Edlow |
| 0:2026cv61947 |
| July 15, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Panayotta D Augustin-Birch |
| Naturalization Application |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 COVER LETTER REQUESTING RESTRICTED ACCESS TO PERSONAL INFORMATION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 5.2 by Brianda Cabrera Medrano. Responses due by 7/29/2026. (amb) (Main Document 5 replaced on 7/15/2026) (amb). |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Joseph B. Edlow, Field Office Director, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General (cwc) |
| Filing 3 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 7/15/2026 in the amount of $ 405.00, receipt number 22333 (cwc) . |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Magistrate Judge Panayotta D. Augustin-Birch. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (cwc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joseph B. Edlow, Field Office Director. Filing fees $ 405.00, filed by Brianda Cabrera Medrano. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summon(s)) (cwc) . |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
