Garcia Umana v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Saul Ernesto Garcia Umana |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Joseph B. Edlow, Markwayne Mullim, Todd Blanche and Jason A. Reading Quinones |
| 0:2026cv62207 |
| August 10, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Patrick M Hunt |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 8/10/2026 in the amount of $ 405.00, receipt number 22460. (drz) (Main Document 4 replaced on 8/10/2026) (drz). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Todd Blanche, Joseph B. Edlow, Markwayne Mullim, Jason A. Reading Quinones, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (drz) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt (drz) |
| Filing 1 Petition (Complaint) for Writ of Mandamus against Todd Blanche, Joseph B. Edlow, Markwayne Mullim, Jason A. Reading Quinones, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. Filing fee $ 405.00, filed by Saul Ernesto Garcia Umana. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (drz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.