enVision Pergolas, LLC v. Plasencia et al
| enVision Pergolas, LLC |
| Hector Plasencia, Luxury Outdoor Kitchen and Living, Inc. and enVision South Florida, LLC |
| 0:2026cv62243 |
| August 12, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Raag Singhal |
| Trademark |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Luxury Outdoor Kitchen and Living, Inc., Hector Plasencia, enVision South Florida, LLC. (pc) |
| Filing 3 FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (pc) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Raag Singhal. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (pc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Luxury Outdoor Kitchen and Living, Inc., Hector Plasencia, enVision South Florida, LLC. Filing fees $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-19858979, filed by enVision Pergolas, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summon(s), #5 Summon(s), #6 Summon(s))(Lee, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
