Morgan v. Coffin et al
| Max Morgan |
| Ann Coffin, Sharon Keri, Eureka Jenkins, William Pursell, Saily Regueiro, Sarah C. Prieto and John/Jane Does 1-10 |
| 0:2026cv62244 |
| August 12, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Detra Shaw-Wilder |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Clerk's Notice to Filer re: Summons(es) will not be issued. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is pending. Filer may file a Notice of Filing Proposed Summons(es) with the summons attached upon motion being granted or payment of filing fee. (caw) |
| Filing 4 Consent by Pro Se Litigant (Non-Prisoner) Max Morgan to receive Notices of Electronic Filing at email address: [email protected]. (caw) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Max Morgan. Responses due by 8/26/2026. (caw) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Magistrate Judge Detra Shaw-Wilder. (caw) |
| Filing 1 Complaint pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against Ann Coffin, John/Jane Does 1-10, Eureka Jenkins, Sharon Keri, Sarah C. Prieto, William Pursell, and Saily Regueiro. Filing fee $ 405.00. IFP Filed, filed by Max Morgan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Summon(s))(caw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
