Lombard v. Redfin Corporation
| Hector Lombard |
| Redfin Corporation |
| 0:2026cv62332 |
| August 24, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Melissa Damian |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE UPON NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT. The Unopposed Motion to Stay DE #12 is GRANTED. The above-styled action is STAYED and administratively CLOSED without prejudice to the parties to file the appropriate dismissal document, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A), within forty-five (45) days of the date of this Order. Any deadlines previously set are TERMINATED, and any pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case for administrative and statistical purposes only. Signed by Judge Melissa Damian on 9/28/2026. See attached document for full details. (ebz)
|
| Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION to Stay re #10 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand to State Court , 9 Notice of Court Practice/to Appear/Other,,,,,,,,,, in light of notice of settlement or, in the alternative, ( Responses due by 10/13/2026.), Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer to motion to remand by Redfin Corporation. (Slade, Jared) |
|
Filing 11
PAPERLESS ORDER Granting #5 Motion for Second Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Finding good cause for the requested relief, and noting that Plaintiff does not oppose the requested extension of time [ECF No. 7], it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall file a response to the Complaint on or before October 26, 2026. Signed by Judge Melissa Damian on 9/24/2026. (oco)
|
| Answer Due Deadline RESET per DE 11 Order. Redfin Corporation response/answer due 10/26/2026. (amb) |
| Filing 10 Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand to State Court by Hector Lombard. Responses due by 10/7/2026. (Balbuzanova, Veronika) |
|
Filing 9
PAPERLESS NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE IN REMOVAL CASES THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon a sua sponte review of the record.In the event counsel for the non-removing party seeks to file a motion to remand the case based on any defect other than lack of subject matter jurisdiction, such a motion must be filed within thirty (30) days after the filing of the notice of removal under 28 U.S.C. 1446(b). The issue of lack of subject matter jurisdiction may be raised at any time. See 28 U.S.C. 1447(c).Counsel for the removing party is directed to file and serve a Removal Status Report no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Failure to file a timely Removal Status Report shall be ground for remand. In addition to the Removal Status Report, counsel for the removing party must file copies of all records in the state court proceedings by that date.The Removal Status Report shall contain the following:1. A plain statement of the nature of the claim and any counterclaim, cross-claim or third-party claim made in state or federal court, including the amount of damages claimed and any other relief sought. 2. A plain statement of the ground for removal and a listing of all parties to the action, including parties to any third-party claim.3. A list of all pending motions.4. A brief statement by each Defendant explaining whether or not each has joined in or consented to the notice of removal.5. A statement regarding whether the Defendant(s) have removed the action within thirty (30) days after the receipt by the Defendant(s), through service or otherwise, of a copy of the initial pleading setting forth the claim for relief upon which the action or proceeding is based, or within thirty (30) days after service of summons upon the Defendant(s), if such initial pleading has then been filed in court and is not required to be served on the Defendant(s) in the action. If the removing party has provided some or all of the above information, briefly summarize the information requested and direct the Court to the location of the information in the record. Failure of the removing party or parties to timely provide in the Removal Status Report the information requested above, or information required by 28 U.S.C. 1446(a), may result in remand of the action.Counsel for the removing party shall provide copies of this Notice to all concerned parties. Signed by Judge Melissa Damian on 9/23/2026. (oco)
|
| Filing 8 PAPERLESS NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE Unless otherwise specified by the Court, every motion, legal memorandum, brief, and otherwise shall:Be double-spaced, in justified alignment, in 12-point font, using a standard font (such as Times New Roman or Arial typeface), with one-inch margins on all sides. Single-spacing is only permitted for footnotes, and parties are cautioned not to use excessive footnotes. This Notice does not supplant the requirements and provisions of Local Rule 7.1.Multiple Plaintiffs or Defendants shall file joint motions (and responses to motions) with co-parties unless there are clear conflicts of position, in which case parties shall request permission to file separate memoranda.Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including but not limited to, the striking of the motion or dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Melissa Damian on 9/23/2026. (oco) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE regarding Conference by Redfin Corporation re #5 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to Complaint re Set/Reset Deadlines, 6 Order,, (Slade, Jared) |
|
Filing 6
PAPERLESS ORDER on Defendant's Motion for Second Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. In the Motion, Defendant requests a 45-day extension of time, through October 26, 2026, to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. However, Defendant's counsel indicates that he was unable to confer with Plaintiff's counsel regarding the relief requested because Plaintiff's counsel was out of the office. Accordingly, on or before September 24, 2026, Defendant shall file a notice indicating whether counsel was able to confer with Plaintiff's counsel regarding the relief requested and state Plaintiff's position on the Motion. Signed by Judge Melissa Damian on 9/22/2026. (oco)
|
| Filing 5 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to Complaint re Set/Reset Deadlines by Redfin Corporation. Responses due by 9/24/2026. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Slade, Jared) |
|
Filing 4
PAPERLESS ORDER Granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Finding good cause for the requested relief, and noting that Plaintiff does not oppose the requested extension of time, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall file a response to the Complaint on or before September 11, 2026. Signed by Judge Melissa Damian on 8/27/2026. (oco)
|
| Set/Reset Response/Answer Due Deadline: Redfin Corporation response/answer due 9/11/2026. (oco) |
| Filing 3 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to Complaint post removal by Redfin Corporation. Responses due by 9/9/2026. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Slade, Jared) |
| Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Melissa Damian. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (khrs) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Complaint) Filing fee $ 405.00 receipt number AFLSDC-19904628, filed by Redfin Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Petition, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Affidavit of Jared Slade in support of Notice of Removal (including state court docket), #4 Affidavit of Mario Marge in support of Notice of Removal, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Slade, Jared) No Motion to Dismiss/No Answer Modified on 8/25/2026 (khrs). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lombard v. Redfin Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Hector Lombard | |
| Represented By: | Veronika Balbuzanova |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Redfin Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Jared M Slade |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
