Ledesma v. Assistant Field Office Director et al
| Alejandro Ledesma |
| Assistant Field Office Director, Facility Administrator Broward Transitional Center, Field Office Director U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Miami Field Office, Secretary U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Attorney General of the United States |
| 0:2026cv62343 |
| August 25, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| David S Leibowitz |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Clerks Notice of Receipt of Filing Fee received on 8/25/2026 in the amount of $5.00, receipt number 22531. (scn) |
| Filing 3 EMERGENCY MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction Prohibiting Transfer of Petitioner Outside the Southern District of Florida by Alejandro Ledesma. Responses due by 9/8/2026. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(scn) |
| Filing 2 Judge Assignment to Judge David S. Leibowitz. (scn) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION/PETITION (Complaint) for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. Filing fee $ 5.00, filed by Alejandro Ledesma. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 Index of Exhibits and Exhibits)Case restricted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2. (scn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.