Safway Steel Product v. Reintjes
Safeway Steel Products |
Reintjes of the South, Inc. |
1:2001cv01812 |
May 1, 2001 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Donald M Middlebrooks |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Contract Dispute |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2002. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 ORDER DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE AND CLOSING CASE:ORDER granting [18-1] notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice. The above referene case is dismissed with prejuidce. Each party shall bear teir resptecive attorney's fees and costs. Any and all pending motions are denied as moot. The Clerk of Court shall close this case( Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 3/18/02) [EOD Date: 3/19/02] (Former Deputy Clerk) |
CASE CLOSED. Case and Motions no longer referred to Magistrate. (Former Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of voluntary dismissal with prejudice by Safway Steel Product (cj, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Hearing: set calendar call for 1:15 5/15/02 before Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks (Former Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 16 ORDER terminating [13-1] motion for protective order as to the SOP Manual, terminating [12-1] motion to compel production of certain documents responsive to Reintjes' First Request for Production of Documents ( Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 12/10/01) [EOD Date: 12/11/01] (ra, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Filing expert witness resume and summary of anticipated testimony by Safway Steel Product (incorporated) (wc, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 14 OPPOSITION by Reintjes to [13-1] motion for protective order as to the SOP Manual (wc, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 13 MOTION by Safway Steel Product for protective order as to the SOP Manual (wc, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 12 MOTION by Reintjes to compel production of certain documents responsive to Reintjes' First Request for Production of Documents (wc, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 11 SCHEDULING ORDER setting Discovery cutoff 3/1/02; Deadline for filing of all motions by 3/15/02; Memos of law due on or before 3/15/02; Jury trial set for 2 week period beginning 5/20/02 (Signed by Magistrate Ted E. Bandstra on 8/31/01) [EOD Date: 9/4/01] CCAP (sn, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 10 Minutes of Scheduling Conference held before Magistrate Ted E. Bandstra on 8/29/01; Court will enter a Scheduling Order and an Order for Mediation. Court Reporter Name or Tape #: 01B-76-336 (wc, Deputy Clerk) |
Scheduling conference held before Magistrate Ted E. Bandstra (wc, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Service of unsigned Answers to First set of Interrogatories by Safway Steel Product (wc, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting [7-1] motion for Jeffrey B. Rosen and Mishca L. Waliczek to appear pro hac vice (Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 8/7/01) [EOD Date: 8/8/01] (sn, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 7 MOTION by Reintjes for Jeffrey B. Rosen and Mishca L. Waliczek to appear pro hac vice (ra, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing Fee Paid; FILING FEE $ 150.00 RECEIPT # 846706 (ra, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 6 Scheduling Report of Scheduling Meeting by Safway Steel Product, Reintjes (wc, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 ORDER and RE-NOTICE reset scheduling conference for 10:00 8/29/01 before Magistrate Ted E. Bandstra ( Signed by Magistrate Ted E. Bandstra on 6/21/01) CCAP [EOD Date: 6/22/01] (wc, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 ORDER and NOTICE set scheduling conference for 10:00 8/1/01 before Magistrate Ted E. Bandstra ; Counsel for the parties shall, within 30 days of the date of this Order, file a Scheduling Report and Joint Proposed Scheduling Order pursuant to Local Rule 16.1.B.7. ( Signed by Magistrate Ted E. Bandstra on 5/23/01) CCAP [EOD Date: 5/25/01] (wc, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 ORDER referring this cause to Magistrate Judge Ted E. Bandstra for the conducting of a Scheduling Conference, pursuant to Local Rule 16.1.B, for the purpose of setting pre-trial deadline dates, a trial date and for determining possible consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge for trial ( Signed by Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks on 5/14/01) CCAP [EOD Date: 5/18/01] (wc, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by Reintjes (wc, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from: 11th Judicial Circuit, Dade Co FILING FEE $150.00 RECEIPT # 841014 ; A-7/TEB (No motions to dismiss or Answer) (wc, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 05/02/2001 |
Magistrate identification: Magistrate Judge Ted E. Bandstra (wc, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Safway Steel Product v. Reintjes | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Safeway Steel Products | |
Represented By: | Sheridan Kay Mills |
Represented By: | William H. Benson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Reintjes of the South, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Denis Lawrence Durkin |
Represented By: | Mishca L. Waliczek |
Represented By: | Jeffrey B. Rosen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.