Disabled Advocates, et al v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
| Disabled Advocates and Counseling Group, Inc. and Steven Brother |
| 7-Eleven, Inc. |
| 1:2003cv22407 |
| September 10, 2003 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Jose E Martinez |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2004. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
FINAL ORDER re: [18-1] dismiss/dismissal stipulation dismissing action with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and denying all pending motions as moot (Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 05/13/04) Date: 5/14/04] (bb, Deputy Clerk)
|
| CASE CLOSED. Case and Motions no longer referred to Magistrate. [7-1] motion to extend time to respond to the complaint, [5-1] motion to extend time to respond to the complaint (bb, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 18 STIPULATION of dismissal by Disabled Advocates, Steven Brother, 7-Eleven, Inc. (bb, Deputy Clerk) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER referring case to mediation. 15 days to appoint mediator (Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 12/04/03) [EOD Date: 12/5/03] (bb, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 16 Election to jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge for final disposition of motions by Disabled Advocates, Steven Brother, 7-Eleven, Inc. (bb, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 15 JOINT Scheduling Report by Disabled Advocates, Steven Brother, 7-Eleven, Inc. (bb, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 14 NON-CONSENT to Trial by Magistrate by 7-Eleven, Inc. (bb, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Actions by 7-Eleven, Inc. (bb, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 12 Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by 7-Eleven, Inc. (bb, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 11 NON-CONSENT to Trial by Magistrate by Disabled Advocates, Steven Brother, 7-Eleven, Inc. (bb, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 10 Joint Scheduling Report by Disabled Advocates, Steven Brother (bb, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 9 Answer and affirmative defenses by 7-Eleven, Inc. (bb, Deputy Clerk) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting [7-1] motion to extend time to respond to the complaint; resetting answer due for 10/23/03 for 7-Eleven, Inc. (Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 10/16/03) [EOD Date: 10/21/03] (bb, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION with memorandum in support by 7-Eleven, Inc. to extend time to respond to the complaint (bb, Deputy Clerk) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting [5-1] motion to extend time to respond to the complaint; setting response to Complaint due for 10/16/03 for 7-Eleven, Inc. (Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 10/09/03) [EOD Date: 10/10/03] (bb, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION with memorandum in support by 7-Eleven, Inc. to extend time to respond to the complaint (bb, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 4 RETURN OF SERVICE executed for 7-Eleven, Inc. on 9/15/03 Answer due on 10/6/03 for 7-Eleven, Inc. (bb, Deputy Clerk) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO MEET AND FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND PROPOSED ORDER AND DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES, counsel for parties shall meet in person for a scheduling Conference at least twenty one (21) days trior to the date the above joint proposed scheduling order is due (Signed by Judge Jose E. Martinez on 09/18/0) [EOD Date: 9/23/03] (ra, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS(ES) issued for 7-Eleven, Inc. (dg, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed; FILING FEE $150.00 RECEIPT # 888941 ; Magistrate Judge Dube (dg, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
