American Association for the Advancement of Science et al v. Periodicals Publicacoes Tecnicas et al
| American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Chemical Society, American Institute of Physics, Blackwell Publishing,Ltd., Elsevier,Inc., Massachusetts Medical Society, Oxford University Press, Royal Society of Chemistry, Sage Publications,Inc., Wiley Periodicals,Inc. and Wiley-Liss,Inc. |
| Periodicals Publicacoes Tecnicas, Subscription Services International Corp., Rubens A. Valerio, Rosemeiri Valerio, Hotline,Inc. and Christopher Fellrath |
| 1:2008cv21696 |
| June 13, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Copyright Office |
| Miami-Dade |
| Cecilia M. Altonaga |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1338 Copyright Infringement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
|
Filing
1
COMPLAINT against Periodicals Publicacoes Tecnicas, Subscription Services International Corp., Rubens A. Valerio, Rosemeiri Valerio, Hotline,Inc., Christopher Fellrath Filing fee $ 350. Receipt#: 982202, filed by American Institute of Physics, Blackwell Publishing,Ltd., American Association for the Advancement of Science, Elsevier,Inc., Massachusetts Medical Society, Oxford University Press, Royal Society of Chemistry, Sage Publications,Inc., Wiley Periodicals,Inc., Wiley-Liss,Inc., American Chemical Society.(rb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
