Thomas v. Warden Harris et al et al
| Permon Thomas |
| Warden Harris et al, Julio Proveda, et al and Dena Tate, et al |
| 1:2008cv21951 |
| August 28, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Miami-Dade |
| Cecilia M. Altonaga |
| Patrick A. White |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 59 Motion for Summary Judgment; accepting in part 80 Report and Recommendations; the trial remains set for the calendar period that begins on 1/19/10. Signed by Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga on 12/29/2009. (ps1)
|
|
Filing
80
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS on 42 USC 1983 case re 59 Defendant's MOTION for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law In Support Thereof filed by Julio Poveda. Recommending 1) defendant Poveda's motion for summary judgment (DE#59) be granted, in part, with respect to claims of delays in provision of testing, passes, assistive devices, and referral to a specialist, and denied, in part, with respect to the claim that he denied plaintiff Poveda medication for relief of pain; and 2) the case remain pending as to the defendant Poveda solely on the claim that he failed to respond, for at least a year, to plaintiff's need for pain relief. Objections to R&R due by 12/7/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patrick A. White on 11/17/2009. (tw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
