CHENEY v. IPD ANALYTICS, LLC et al
CLARK S. CHENEY |
IPD ANALYTICS, LLC, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT, INC., and HOWARD BENJAMIN KRASS |
1:2008cv23188 |
November 17, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Contract: Other Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Federico A. Moreno |
Plaintiff |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 310 ORDER adopting in part 243 Report and Recommendations re 114 Plaintiff Calkins's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Federico A. Moreno on 11/10/2009. (ccg) |
Filing 243 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 114 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Clark S. Cheney, James C. Calkins as to Second Amended Complaint and Amended Counterclaim; Recommending Motion be Granted in Part and Denied in Part. Objections to R&R expedited for good cause and now due by 9/4/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 8/28/2009. (EGT) |
Filing 120 ORDER adopting 101 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Chief Judge Federico A. Moreno on 5/7/2009. (MM) |
Filing 101 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 62 MOTION to Dismiss 56 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim filed by Clark S. Cheney, James C. Calkins. Recommending Motion be Granted in Part and Denied in Part. Objections to R&R due by 5/4/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 4/16/2009. (lc2) |
Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 10/20/2008. (ck) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.