Maplewood Partners, L.P. et al v. Indian Harbor Insurance Company
| Maplewood Partners, L.P., Maplewood Management, L.P. and Maplewood Holdings, LLC |
| Indian Harbor Insurance Company |
| 1:2008cv23343 |
| December 3, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Insurance Office |
| Miami-Dade |
| William M. Hoeveler |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
400
ORDER Granting in Part Defendant's Motion for Further Discovery on Summary Judgment Issues. See Order for details and new scheduling dates. Signed by Judge James I. Cohn on 11/6/2014. (sry)
|
|
Filing
187
ORDER overruling re 66 MOTION for Reconsideration re 64 Order on Motion to Compel (Plaintiffs' Objections to Order Granting Motion to Compel) MOTION for Reconsideration re 64 Order on Motion to Compel (Plaintiffs' Objections to Order Granting Motion to Compel) filed by MapleWood Management, L.P., Maplewood Management, L.P., MapleWood Partners, L.P., Maplewood Holdings, LLC, MapleWood Holdings, LLC, Maplewood Partners, L.P., 67 Response/Reply (Other) filed by MapleWood Management, L.P., Maplewood Management, L.P., MapleWood Partners, L.P., Maplewood Holdings, LLC, MapleWood Holdings, LLC, Maplewood Partners, L.P.. Signed by Senior Judge William M. Hoeveler on 9/5/2011. (tp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
