San Martin v. McNeil
Plaintiff: Pablo San Martin
Defendant: Walter A. McNeil
Case Number: 1:2008cv23487
Filed: February 4, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Office: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus Office
County: Miami-Dade
Presiding Judge: Paul C. Huck
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER Denying Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus, all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT and thios case is CLOSED (see order for details). Signed by Judge Paul C. Huck on 8/13/2009. (cqs) Modified to opinion status on 11/6/2009 (dg).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: San Martin v. McNeil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pablo San Martin
Represented By: Gustavo Jesus Garcia-Montes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walter A. McNeil
Represented By: Noticing 2254 State Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?