Pineda v. McNeil
Plaintiff: Hernan D. Pineda
Defendant: Walter A. McNeil
Case Number: 1:2009cv20816
Filed: March 31, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Miami-Dade
Presiding Judge: K. Michael Moore
Presiding Judge: Patrick A. White
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 3 REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE on 28 USC 2254 case re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Hernan D. Pineda. Recommending dismissing. Objections to R&R due by 4/24/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patrick A. White on 4/6/2009. (tw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pineda v. McNeil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hernan D. Pineda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walter A. McNeil
Represented By: Noticing 2254 State Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?