Torres v. Kaplan
Plaintiff: Jorge Torres
Defendant: Kaplan Higher Education Corporation
Case Number: 1:2009cv21733
Filed: June 24, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Office: Miami Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Patricia A. Seitz
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 107 ORDER Granting 53 Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint filed by Kaplan Higher Education Corporation. a) Relator's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. b) This case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Patricia A. Seitz on 8/22/2011. {duplicate of 106 Order} (gp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Torres v. Kaplan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jorge Torres
Represented By: Ronald Barry Schwartz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kaplan Higher Education Corporation
Represented By: James L. Zelenay, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?