U.S. Holdings, Inc v. SunTrust Banks, Inc. et al
| U.S. Holdings, Inc |
| SunTrust Banks, Inc. and Suntrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. |
| 1:2009cv23222 |
| October 23, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
| Miami Office |
| Miami-Dade |
| K. Michael Moore |
| Andrea M. Simonton |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
138
ORDER granting in part 123 Plaintiff's Request for Leave of Court to Take in Excess of Ten Depositions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton on 3/23/2011. (mmn)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER denying, without prejudice to renew, 80 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and for Sanctions. By January 10, 2011 the parties shall meet in person and confer concerning the remaining discovery issues. By January 18, 2011, Plaintiff may filed a renewed motion to compel, to which Defendants shall respond within seven calendar days thereafter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton on 12/27/2010. (dlt)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 56 Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order; granting in part and denying in part 59 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel; granting in part and denying in part 61 Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order; and granting 72 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrea M. Simonton on 10/25/2010. (par)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
