Young v. Antar
Plaintiff: Aaron Young
Defendant: Hossam Antar
Case Number: 1:2011mc20928
Filed: March 17, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Office: Miami Office
County: Miami-Dade
Presiding Judge: Ursula Ungaro
Nature of Suit: Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment
Cause of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS: denying 9 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 9 Motion for Hearing; granting 10 Motion to Institute Proceedings Supplementary; denying 14 Motion for Protective Order; denying 16 Motion for Sanctions; denying 16 Motion for Contempt; granting 16 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres on 7/25/2011. (EGT)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Young v. Antar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hossam Antar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aaron Young
Represented By: Robert A. Stok
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?