First Time Videos, LLC v. Does 1-76

First Time Videos, LLC v. Does 1-76

Plaintiff:	First Time Videos, LLC
Defendant:	Does 1-76
Case Number:	1:2012cv20921
Filed:	March 6, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Office:	Miami Office
County:	Miami-Dade
Presiding Judge:	Joan A. Lenard
Presiding Judge:	John J. O'Sullivan
Nature of Suit:	Copyrights
Cause of Action:	17 U.S.C. § 0101
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 21, 2012	Filing 63 ORDER denying the motions for protective order and/or to quash subpoena in [39,40,45,46,47 and 49]; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that [40, 45, 46 and 48]MOTIONs to Dismiss be denied and recommending that 39 MOTION to Dismiss be denied as moot. ( Objections to R&R due by 12/10/2012) Signed by Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 11/21/2012. (mms)
June 28, 2012	Filing 27 ORDER denying re 17 MOTION to Quash, MOTION for Protective Order, MOTION to Sever filed by John Doe 74.178.230.219; denying 9 MOTION to Quash, MOTION to Sever, MOTION for Protective Order filed by John Doe 74.4.213.245; denying 10 MOTION to Quash, MOTION to Sever, MOTION for Protective Order filed by John Doe 72.91.240.135; denying 12 MOTION to Sever for Improper Joinder, MOTION for Protective Order, Motion to Quash Subpoena filed by John Doe 72.64.232.247; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending denying [9,10, 12 and 17] MOTIONS to dismiss.( Objections to R&R due by 7/16/2012), Motions, terminated: [9, 10, 12, 17] except MOTIONS to dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 6/28/2012. (mms)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 21, 2012

Filing 63 ORDER denying the motions for protective order and/or to quash subpoena in [39,40,45,46,47 and 49]; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that [40, 45, 46 and 48]MOTIONs to Dismiss be denied and recommending that 39 MOTION to Dismiss be denied as moot. ( Objections to R&R due by 12/10/2012) Signed by Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 11/21/2012. (mms)

June 28, 2012

Filing 27 ORDER denying re 17 MOTION to Quash, MOTION for Protective Order, MOTION to Sever filed by John Doe 74.178.230.219; denying 9 MOTION to Quash, MOTION to Sever, MOTION for Protective Order filed by John Doe 74.4.213.245; denying 10 MOTION to Quash, MOTION to Sever, MOTION for Protective Order filed by John Doe 72.91.240.135; denying 12 MOTION to Sever for Improper Joinder, MOTION for Protective Order, Motion to Quash Subpoena filed by John Doe 72.64.232.247; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending denying [9,10, 12 and 17] MOTIONS to dismiss.( Objections to R&R due by 7/16/2012), Motions, terminated: [9, 10, 12, 17] except MOTIONS to dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 6/28/2012. (mms)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: First Time Videos, LLC v. Does 1-76
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: First Time Videos, LLC
Represented By:	Joseph Perea
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-76
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?